On Monday 23 August 2004 01.25, Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
> Erik:
> > (ugly, but it should work)
>
> Yup (to both!)... ;-)
> Thanks!
>
> BTW: is this a known "bug"/"feature", or should I report it?
It's a consequence of the way grace note timing currently works.
After thinking twice, I foun
Erik:
(ugly, but it should work)
Yup (to both!)... ;-)
Thanks!
BTW: is this a known "bug"/"feature", or should I report it?
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Sunday 22 August 2004 22.51, Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
> Hello, Graham:
> > A workaround is to include a tiny spacer rest right before your grace
> > notes:
>
> That definitely works -- thanks!
> However, now my barcheck is off (by the amount of the rest) -- can I
> fix that somehow (e.g.,
Hello, Graham:
A workaround is to include a tiny spacer rest right before your grace
notes:
That definitely works -- thanks!
However, now my barcheck is off (by the amount of the rest) -- can I
fix that somehow (e.g., shift or reset the bar checking mechanism)?
Thanks again,
Kieren.
___
