Re: grouping in 6/8

2017-04-23 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 23.04.2017 um 22:23 schrieb Michael Käppler: Hi Karol, it depends on which rhythmical structure you want to express. If you intend a base structure in 8ths where the 4th note is not stressed, I would prefer (2). If you want to achieve a base structure in dotted 8ths, like a 12/16 signature d

Re: grouping in 6/8

2017-04-23 Thread Michael Käppler
Hi Karol, it depends on which rhythmical structure you want to express. If you intend a base structure in 8ths where the 4th note is not stressed, I would prefer (2). If you want to achieve a base structure in dotted 8ths, like a 12/16 signature divided in four beats, I would write (1). HTH, M

grouping in 6/8

2017-04-23 Thread Karol Majewski
Hi, which grouping is better: 6/8: c16 c16 c16 c8.~ c4. or 6/8: c16 c16 c6 c16~ c8~ c4. Couldn't find the answer in "Behind Bars". -Best KM ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user