Graham,
> Any advanced Lilypond users out there
Well, I'm not an advanced user but I'll give a try :))
> 1) add-staccato.ly: the staccatos don't get added. The make-music and
> scm stuff needs to be fixed/updated. (hint: add-text-script.ly does
> work; maybe that can help you with add-stacc
Graham,
> Any advanced Lilypond users out there
Well, I'm not an advanced user but I'll give a try :))
> 1) add-staccato.ly: the staccatos don't get added. The make-music and
> scm stuff needs to be fixed/updated. (hint: add-text-script.ly does
> work; maybe that can help you with add-stacca
Graham,
> Any advanced Lilypond users out there
Well, I'm not an advanced user but I'll give a try :))
> 1) add-staccato.ly: the staccatos don't get added. The make-music and
> scm stuff needs to be fixed/updated. (hint: add-text-script.ly does
> work; maybe that can help you with add-stacca
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 12:13:34 +0200
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Han? You've made almost all the changes to tutorial.itely in recent
> > times. What happened to "Fine tuning a piece"?
>
> Some parts were moved to the refman. Follow the links, in part
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 18:31:03 +0200
> Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Want to fix problems in the Lilypond documentation
> >
> > I really wonder where "Fine tuning a piece" went from the
> > Tutorial? It is
On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 18:31:03 +0200
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Want to fix problems in the Lilypond documentation
>
> I really wonder where "Fine tuning a piece" went from the
> Tutorial? It is in stable, but not in development. I fi
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Want to fix problems in the Lilypond documentation
I really wonder where "Fine tuning a piece" went from the
Tutorial? It is in stable, but not in development. I find
it quite good, by the way, save some disorganization.
The example in boxed-molecule.ly does not use the new macro (at least in
1.7.22).
I'd be interested in examples of how to use that macro. Especially to
see if I can wire it into markup. I'd like to draw boxes around parts
of a text markup.
Dick
On Sun, 2003-06-29 at 16:59, Mats Bengtsson wrote
> 3) boxed-molecule.ly: knowledge of #'molecule-callback. I think we're
> missing a few boxes in this example.
Note that there is a predefined Scheme macro available
now for boxeded molecules. I don't remember if this example
file uses the macro or contains some old definition of its own.
Any advanced Lilypond users out there (other than the regular devel
team)? Want to fix problems in the Lilypond documentation, get 1.8
released sooner, make the world a better place, feed starving puppies,
and bring sunshine to dark places? Ok, I was joking about the last two
options. But the res
10 matches
Mail list logo
