2008/2/11, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, you missed the subtext. I wasn't asking for a poll of who
considered the index useful, I was saying I'm not going to work
on this. Any volunteers?
I'm probably the one responsible for having hijacked your topic :)
Sorry,
Valentin
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:25:08 +0100
From: Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GDP: index entries for snippets
To: Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lilypond-user Mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org
Message-ID
+0100
From: Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GDP: index entries for snippets
To: Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lilypond-user Mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
2008/2/8, Graham Percival [EMAIL
2008/2/8, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Of course, I famously never use the index, so I'm not the best
person to judge whether certain index entries are helpful or not.
Neither am I :-) Anyone else?
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing
Ho,
As a librarian-in-training I have to agree with Jay (it generally hurts more
omitting an entry than including it, especially in a open project like this
that/which doesn't really have page limits to think about). I've been
thinking on speaking up about the indeces for quite some while now but
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:55:06 +0100
Kess Vargavind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, I love indeces (indexes?) and use them everywhere.
Would you be willing to maintain the indeces/indexes? Some of the
doc writers (including myself) either aren't good, or aren't
interested, in trying to think of
Not knowing the question to ask is often a problem for me to. You are
not alone with this experience.
Perhaps he is asking how docbook format works. I'm just guessing about
his query myself.
The html version's indeces. See above for general pointers, there
really is just one main thing
Latest GDP docs
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
(although these are almost identical to the 2.11.39 docs at the
moment)
Do we want index entries for snippets? For example, in
NR 1.1.3.2 Key signature
there are two snippets: suppressing natural signs in key
signatures, and non-standard key
Graham Percival wrote on 08 February 2008 19:49
Do we want index entries for snippets? For example, in
NR 1.1.3.2 Key signature
there are two snippets: suppressing natural signs in key
signatures, and non-standard key signatures.
Do you want to have items like:
@cindex key signatures
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 21:08:08 -
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@cindex natural sign, suppressing
At present the only entry for naturals takes you to
a section on text markup commands. Not helpful if
you're looking for a way to suppress extra naturals.
Well, obviously we want a
Graham Percival wrote on 08 February 2008 21:26
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 21:08:08 -
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@cindex natural sign, suppressing
At present the only entry for naturals takes you to
a section on text markup commands. Not helpful if
you're looking for a
As a former librarian, I know that creating indexes is a total pain and
unfortunately should be as extensive and repetitious as possible.
Over-estimating the users ability/intelligence is a grave error.
Yours-
Jay
Jay Hamilton
___
lilypond-user
12 matches
Mail list logo
