On Fri 04 Mar 2016 at 07:12:38 (-0600), David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 04 Mar 2016 at 09:48:16 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote:
> > David Wright writes:
> >
> > > OK. This one is quite pernicious, but depends on having the : at the
> > > beginning of $PATH, which might happen if someone thought the sy
Hi BB,
I have already explained that I aboslutele do not understand what's
the sense, the goal, the informativ content of this thread. I
recommend to ignore that inflated contraproductive nonsense logorrhoea
thread! Or does anybody see a win for lilypond users? Is it an attempt
to abuse lilyp
On Fri 04 Mar 2016 at 09:48:16 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote:
> David Wright writes:
>
> > OK. This one is quite pernicious, but depends on having the : at the
> > beginning of $PATH, which might happen if someone thought the syntax
> > was meant to be, say, PATH=:patha:pathb:and-so-on:
> >
> > $
On 04.03.2016 10:05, Bernard wrote:
Hi Jordan and David Wrigth,
Let me tell thank I am confused on what is being said, who has which
point of view. I could start research in this thread but I would be
very time consuming, and even then the value of the result is limited.
I get the impression I
Hi Jordan and David Wrigth,
Let me tell thank I am confused on what is being said, who has which
point of view. I could start research in this thread but I would be very
time consuming, and even then the value of the result is limited.
I get the impression I am not the only one who is confused.
Am 4. März 2016 09:48:16 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup :
>David Wright writes:
>
>> OK. This one is quite pernicious, but depends on having the : at the
>> beginning of $PATH, which might happen if someone thought the syntax
>> was meant to be, say, PATH=:patha:pathb:and-so-on:
>>
>> $ echo $PATH
>
David Wright writes:
> OK. This one is quite pernicious, but depends on having the : at the
> beginning of $PATH, which might happen if someone thought the syntax
> was meant to be, say, PATH=:patha:pathb:and-so-on:
>
> $ echo $PATH
> :/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:
This is a terrible PATH: it se
David.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[8]lilypond-user@gnu.org
[9]https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 03.03.2016 18:08, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 03 Mar 2016 at 09:37:55 (+0100), Blöchl Bernhard wrote:
Original
On Thu 03 Mar 2016 at 22:02:14 (+0100), Urs Liska wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.03.2016 um 21:36 schrieb David Wright:
> > On Thu 03 Mar 2016 at 12:41:28 (+0100), Urs Liska wrote:
> >
> >> The LilyPond installation is really trouble-less, and I have the feeling
> >> that all the confusion came up because so
Hi Bernard
>> http://lilypond.org/unix.html before? There is a small "Install"
>> section. What was missing for you?
>>
>> Yes I saw that, but it was missing install from shell. I really
>> prefer using apt-get because I have bad experience with download
>> and install because of the depencies he
Am 03.03.2016 um 21:36 schrieb David Wright:
> On Thu 03 Mar 2016 at 12:41:28 (+0100), Urs Liska wrote:
>
>> The LilyPond installation is really trouble-less, and I have the feeling
>> that all the confusion came up because someone mixed LilyPond and
>> Frescobaldi.
>>
>> If you don't want to ins
On Thu 03 Mar 2016 at 12:41:28 (+0100), Urs Liska wrote:
> The LilyPond installation is really trouble-less, and I have the feeling
> that all the confusion came up because someone mixed LilyPond and
> Frescobaldi.
>
> If you don't want to install LilyPond using apt-get (for example because
> you
On Thu 03 Mar 2016 at 12:33:18 (+0100), Bernard wrote:
> Thanks for your, and also others, replies Lilypond and Frescbaldi
> works for me now, but this effort of you and others is meant to let
> Frescobadi and Lilypond be installed easily for everybody. I feel
> this effort is good. And I would lik
seriously. Did you find the Linux download page
> [7]http://lilypond.org/unix.html before? There is a small "Install"
> section. What was missing for you?
>
> - Should it mention the --prefix option?
> - Should it mention that you can have several versions installed i
On 03.03.2016 18:08, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 03 Mar 2016 at 09:37:55 (+0100), Blöchl Bernhard wrote:
Originalnachricht
Betreff: Re: install frescoba 2.18.2 in Ubuntu
Datum: 03.03.2016 09:03
Von: Blöchl Bernhard
An: lilypond-user@gnu.org
The headline in the original
settings part new to you? Should it be
mentioned?
Cheers,
David.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 03.03.2016 18:08, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 03 Mar 2016 at 09:37:55 (+01
On Thu 03 Mar 2016 at 09:37:55 (+0100), Blöchl Bernhard wrote:
>
>
> Originalnachricht
> Betreff: Re: install frescoba 2.18.2 in Ubuntu
> Datum: 03.03.2016 09:03
> Von: Blöchl Bernhard
> An: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>
> The headline in the orig
Hi Urs,
As said, for installing LilyPond there are no further requirements.
Understood.
Is there interest for such a support program for Lilypond and
Frescobaldi?
You should definitely get in touch with Sharon Rosner (also on this
list) because he has done a lot in that direction recently (
Am 03.03.2016 um 12:33 schrieb Bernard:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for your, and also others, replies Lilypond and Frescbaldi
> works for me now, but this effort of you and others is meant to let
> Frescobadi and Lilypond be installed easily for everybody. I feel this
> effort is good. And I would li
Hi David,
Thanks for your, and also others, replies Lilypond and Frescbaldi works
for me now, but this effort of you and others is meant to let Frescobadi
and Lilypond be installed easily for everybody. I feel this effort is
good. And I would like to help.
Lets go one step back. The mail is
Originalnachricht
Betreff: Re: install frescoba 2.18.2 in Ubuntu
Datum: 03.03.2016 09:03
Von: Blöchl Bernhard
An: lilypond-user@gnu.org
The headline in the original post was not correctly positioned! The
subsequent text to it was NOT written by David Wright but lies in my
Am 03.03.2016 06:40, schrieb David Wright:
I did not read the complete thread and after reading the last posting I
will not do that. That is a collection of citation of unverified storys,
opinions and wishes. I do not understand the central problem and how to
address it to lilypond? And Fresco
On Sun 28 Feb 2016 at 08:29:52 (+0100), Bernard wrote:
> Hi Noeck,
>
> Second reply, I was not reading to careful.
>
> http://lilypond.org/unix.html before? There is a small "Install"
> section. What was missing for you?
>
> Yes I saw that, but it was missing install from shell. I really
> prefe
Hi Noeck,
Second reply, I was not reading to careful.
http://lilypond.org/unix.html before? There is a small "Install"
section. What was missing for you?
Yes I saw that, but it was missing install from shell. I really prefer
using apt-get because I have bad experience with download and instal
Hi Noeck,
Very good idea. I am happy to help.
First of all the page : http://frescobaldi.org/download
For me that page is in Dutch, so I am not 100% sure what you can see or
read. I prefer the Wikipedia style, you can pin-point to a specific
page, in a specific language, most often English. W
Am 27.02.2016 um 19:11 schrieb Noeck:
- Should it mention the --prefix option?
IMO: Yes, and maybe the possibility of installing as root; these options
seem to be commonly unknown.
- Should it mention that you can have several versions installed in
parallel?
Would be nice, I didn’t k
Hi Bernard,
Am 27.02.2016 um 18:54 schrieb Bernard:
> Wow, Joram. Thank you very much. Did this work.
Glad it helped you.
> Update the installation documentation with your info would help very much.
There was a similar question just a few days ago, so I take this request
for improvement serious
Wow, Joram. Thank you very much. Did this work.
Update the installation documentation with your info would help very much.
Greetings
Bernard
On 27-02-16 18:14, Noeck wrote:
Hi Bernard,
Am 27.02.2016 um 18:01 schrieb Bernard:
Is there a easy way to install Frescobaldi and Lilypond 2.18.2 on
Hi Bernard,
Am 27.02.2016 um 18:01 schrieb Bernard:
> Is there a easy way to install Frescobaldi and Lilypond 2.18.2 on Ubuntu
> 14.04? If so how?
Yes. Just install Frescobaldi as you did. As you wrote, you get LilyPond
2.16 with it. But that does not hurt. You can then download
the stable versio
I installed Frescobaldi in Ubuntu using apt-get. Which installed itself
Lilypond. Very easy, unfortunately using version 2.16.2
apt-get did mention all dependencies, how it should be, but very outdated.
I would like to use Frecobaldi and Lilypond 2.18.2 Which causes a
dependency hell for me.
30 matches
Mail list logo