Marcus Macauley wrote:
Or are we expected to search the main documentation, and failing that,
Regression Tests, Tips and Tricks, and Examples, and failing that, the
email archives, and failing that, a message to lilypond-user?
Currently, yes. Although you missed the unofficial wiki; that's a
Hi, Marcus:
That's just what I was looking for!
Glad I could help!
The same trick works for ChoirStaff or StaffGroup, too, adding a
new \context block for each.
Exactly so...
Or are we expected to search the main documentation, and failing
that, Regression Tests, Tips and Tricks, and E
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:39:09 -0400, Kieren MacMillan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Marcus:
Just a quick suggestion. Why not let a GrandStaff have an instrumentName
(and a shortInstrumentName), just like a Staff and a PianoStaff already
do?
Just in case you don't know, you can always add
Hi, Marcus:
Just a quick suggestion. Why not let a GrandStaff have an
instrumentName
(and a shortInstrumentName), just like a Staff and a PianoStaff
already do?
Just in case you don't know, you can always add this feature to your
own scores with
\context
{
\GrandStaff
\consists
Hi,
Just a quick suggestion. Why not let a GrandStaff have an instrumentName
(and a shortInstrumentName), just like a Staff and a PianoStaff already do?
Instrument names could even be allowed for a ChoirStaff or a StaffGroup,
though I imagine the need to use it in those cases would be less
