Re: invisible note for expressive marks

On Sun 29 May 2016 at 11:00:11 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote: > Thomas Morley writes: > > >> \version "2.19.40" > >> { > >> <> \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {c' d' e' f'} <> \! > >> } > >> \addlyrics { \repeat unfold 3 { c d e f } } > >> > >> { > >> s1*0 \p \< \repeat

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

I see Thanks Stephen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

Stephen MacNeil writes: > sorry forgot to sent to list > > > Hi David > > so based on that I would assume > > \addlyrics { \repeat unfold 3 { c4 d e f } } > > > would work? > > > and it does, so It seems that with s1*0 you need c4 added to \addlyrics as > well? Yes.

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

sorry forgot to sent to list Hi David so based on that I would assume \addlyrics { \repeat unfold 3 { c4 d e f } } would work? and it does, so It seems that with s1*0 you need c4 added to \addlyrics as well? Stephen ___ lilypond-user mailing

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

Thomas Morley writes: >> \version "2.19.40" >> { >> <> \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {c' d' e' f'} <> \! >> } >> \addlyrics { \repeat unfold 3 { c d e f } } >> >> { >> s1*0 \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {c'4 d' e' f'} s1*0 \! >> } >> \addlyrics { \repeat unfold 3 { c d e f } } >>

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

I tried > > { > > s1*0 \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {c'4 d' e' f'} s1*0 \! > > } > > \addlyrics { \repeat unfold 3 { c d e f } } and I simply see it doesn't work but I have no idea why ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

2016-05-29 10:24 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2016-05-29 8:49 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari : >>> The spacer rest does not work but the empty chord does! >> >> To be complete, spacers do work here if scaled

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

Thomas Morley writes: > 2016-05-29 8:49 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari : >> The spacer rest does not work but the empty chord does! > > To be complete, spacers do work here if scaled properly, although > empty chords are more handy, imho > > { >

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

2016-05-29 8:49 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari : > The spacer rest does not work but the empty chord does! To be complete, spacers do work here if scaled properly, although empty chords are more handy, imho { s1*0 \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {c'4 d' e' f'} s1*0 \! } Cheers,

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

The spacer rest does not work but the empty chord does! So here it is a working example that in my opinion can be very useful: \version "2.19.40" { <> \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {c' d' e' f'} <> \! } Thank you Abraham! ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

On 28/05/16 19:03, Marc Hohl wrote: > Am 28.05.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: >> The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it >> exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid >> this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p > > That's

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

Am 28.05.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p That's exactly what I used as an example in you other

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

Am 28.05.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it > exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid > this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p Do you have a concrete example of what you want to

Re: invisible note for expressive marks

On Saturday, May 28, 2016, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it > exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid > this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p > Uh, spacer rests? s\p Or

invisible note for expressive marks

The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list