I see the same thing:
{
g' b' c'' e''1
g' b' c'' e''1
g' b' c'' e''1
g' b' c'' e''1
}
This looks weird.
On 4/20/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously:
I've been using 2.8.1 for a while now, and it really seems to me that
the spacing of measures is non-optimal.
I've
Hello, all --
I've been using 2.8.1 for a while now, and it really seems to me that
the spacing of measures is non-optimal.
In particular, padding before extras on the first note of any
measure seems way off. Recently, I've posted about this issue
regarding accidentals. Here is a
Previously:
I've been using 2.8.1 for a while now, and it really seems to me that
the spacing of measures is non-optimal.
I've noticed the same thing. It looks like an accidental on the first note of
a measure is put into the spacing instead of being put after it. Since I'm
doing my EIS
