keeping dynamics, etc out of TabStaff and/or TabVoice

2010-11-08 Thread Mike Jarmy
I'm working on a guitar score that has both a 'normal' Staff and a TabStaff. The 'normal' Staff has two Voices, and the TabStaff has two TabVoices. I define the music separately, using one group of notes for each voice, and then include it all into each Staff. It works very nicely. However, it

Re: keeping dynamics, etc out of TabStaff and/or TabVoice

2010-11-08 Thread Federico Bruni
What you want is the default look of TabStaff since version 2.13.4, IIRC. I suggest you to install the latest development version. 2010/11/8 Mike Jarmy > I'm working on a guitar score that has both a 'normal' Staff and a > TabStaff. The 'normal' Staff has two Voices, and the TabStaff has two >

Re: keeping dynamics, etc out of TabStaff and/or TabVoice

2010-11-08 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Mike Jarmy" To: Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 3:36 PM Subject: keeping dynamics, etc out of TabStaff and/or TabVoice I'm working on a guitar score that has both a 'normal' Staff and a TabStaff. The 'normal' Staff h

Re: keeping dynamics, etc out of TabStaff and/or TabVoice

2010-11-08 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 8 November 2010 16:36, Mike Jarmy wrote: > > I'm working on a guitar score that has both a 'normal' Staff and a > TabStaff. The 'normal' Staff has two Voices, and the TabStaff has two > TabVoices. I define the music separately, using one group of notes > for each voice, and then include it al

Re: keeping dynamics, etc out of TabStaff and/or TabVoice

2010-11-08 Thread Xavier Scheuer
Cc to the list. Please "reply to all". ;-) On 8 November 2010 18:46, Mike Jarmy wrote: > > I'm running 2.12.3, so I need to remove the Ottava_spanner_engraver > from TabStaff as well. The following works for me: > > \version "2.12.3" > > treble = { >\ottava #1 >c''16\f\> d e f g f e d\

Re: keeping dynamics, etc out of TabStaff and/or TabVoice

2010-11-08 Thread Mike Jarmy
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Xavier Scheuer wrote: > Cc to the list. > Please "reply to all".  ;-) oops ;-) > Yeah, I did not check (but that's why I said 2.13.38). > So it solved now, right? that's right, thanks much -- Mike ___ lilypond-user ma