Re: layout-set-staff-size units

2007-01-04 Thread Graham Percival
Mats Bengtsson wrote: - The text that I recently added to the manual is wrong, since it doesn't include the (* ... pt) to get the correct scaling. However, it seems more reasonable to change the function itself to use pt as the scale (the function is called internally at some places, which

Re: layout-set-staff-size units

2007-01-02 Thread Mats Bengtsson
I must have dreamt that I tried it. Anyway, it seems that the unit of the argument is not the same as for global-set-staff-size. If you try #(layout-set-staff-size (* 14.0 pt)) you will get the correct size. Still, the staff line spacing isn't adjusted as long as the function is called within a

Re: layout-set-staff-size units

2007-01-01 Thread Mats Bengtsson
It did work last time I tried it. Could you please include a small example that illustrates what you tried. /Mats gnomino wrote: Hello, What are the units of #(layout-set-staff-size)? The documentation (11.2.1) suggests that the units are points, like #(set-global-staff-size), but the

Re: layout-set-staff-size units

2007-01-01 Thread gnomino
Mats Bengtsson wrote: It did work last time I tried it. Could you please include a small example that illustrates what you tried. The following does not work (everything except for lines are too big): \score { \relative c'' { \clef treble \key c \major

layout-set-staff-size units

2006-12-28 Thread gnomino
Hello, What are the units of #(layout-set-staff-size)? The documentation (11.2.1) suggests that the units are points, like #(set-global-staff-size), but the results are that note heads end up being more than twice as big. Also, putting the command in a \layout block (as in the doc example)