Re: lilyglyphs not found in ubuntu packages 20.04

2020-08-29 Thread Urs Liska
Am Samstag, den 29.08.2020, 14:14 +0200 schrieb bart deruyter: > Thanks for the update, I'll look into how I can change my document so > it uses lyluatex only. I used lyluatex to include complete scores in > my document, not for single musical signs, for that I used > lilyglyphs. That's the idea,

Re: lilyglyphs not found in ubuntu packages 20.04

2020-08-29 Thread bart deruyter
Thanks for the update, I'll look into how I can change my document so it uses lyluatex only. I used lyluatex to include complete scores in my document, not for single musical signs, for that I used lilyglyphs. Actually I'm considering to drop the latex road and switch to libreoffice, for one big im

Re: lilyglyphs not found in ubuntu packages 20.04

2020-08-28 Thread Urs Liska
Hi Bart, thanks for reminding. Am Freitag, den 28.08.2020, 21:20 +0200 schrieb bart deruyter: > Hi all, > I would need to start working on my project again, using luatex, > lilypond, lyluatex and lilyglyphs. But lilyglyphs appears to be > missing from the ubuntu packages. This summer I upgraded to

lilyglyphs not found in ubuntu packages 20.04

2020-08-28 Thread bart deruyter
Hi all, I would need to start working on my project again, using luatex, lilypond, lyluatex and lilyglyphs. But lilyglyphs appears to be missing from the ubuntu packages. This summer I upgraded to 20.04 though, and I found out to my surprise, lilyglyphs is missing. It is present in 'eoan' though.