Hi,
How do I convert lilypond to musicxml?
Regards
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, rosea grammostola wrote:
Hi,
How do I convert lilypond to musicxml?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665
--
MT
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
On 11/20/2011 03:38 PM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, rosea grammostola wrote:
Hi,
How do I convert lilypond to musicxml?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665
Big pita that there is no such functionality yet. Open source is
(almost) always walking
- Original Message -
From: "rosea grammostola"
To: "Martin Tarenskeen"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: lilypond to musicxml
On 11/20/2011 03:38 PM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, rosea grammostola wrote:
Hi,
How do I
2011/11/20 rosea grammostola :
> Big pita that there is no such functionality yet. Open source is (almost)
> always walking behind and hard to get a decent workflow with music related
> stuff...
If you compare LilyPond to most engraving software, I'd rather say the
opposite. And pirating software
Hello folks,The recent posts on this subject show there is interest in the matter. Sorry for the length of this one...My work was initially homed by Grame’s libmusicxml2 library as an example of what it could be used for, in the lilypond branch at https://github.com/grame-cncm/libmusicxml/tree/lily
Hi Jacques,
Am Mo., 27. Sept. 2021 um 00:48 Uhr schrieb Jacques Menu
:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> The recent posts on this subject show there is interest in the matter. Sorry
> for the length of this one...
Tbh, most of the mor detailed stuff is way over my head..
>
> My work was initially homed by Gr
Sorry - edited subject to get the linking correct
Harm,
https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/42315/lilypond-to-musicxml-to-sibelius#73706
has a discussion about this as well. I've started looking at the OpenLilyLib
solution at the bottom of the thread but it doesn't wor
lilypond-to-musicxml export is a frequentlly asked, but easier said than done, feature request, that pops up from time to time. And everytime it doesn't reach a point beyond discussions and experimental or quite incomplete implementations. Apparently both MusicXML and LilyPond are complex b
Agreed, but it's possible that someone here might know more about this project
and now it's getting on.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Tuesday, October 5, 2021, 12:53:43 PM, m.tarensk...@kpnmail.nl wrote:
> lilypond-to-music
Le 05/10/2021 à 13:08, Peter Toye a écrit :
Sorry - edited subject to get the linking correct
Harm,
https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/42315/lilypond-to-musicxml-to-sibelius#73706
<https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/42315/lilypond-to-musicxml-to-sibelius#73706>
edited subject to get the linking correct
>> Harm,
>> https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/42315/lilypond-to-musicxml-to-sibelius#73706
>> >
>> <https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/42315/lilypond-to-musicxml-to-sibelius#73706>
>> has > a
Am Do., 7. Okt. 2021 um 11:30 Uhr schrieb Peter Toye :
>
> The potential need has gone away now - my Sibelius user has told me that he
> uses ScoreMuse to export the PDF into a suitable format for Sibelius. Looks
> to me like an expensive way of doing it, but if he can afford Sibelius he can
> p
Toye a écrit :
>
>
> Sorry - edited subject to get the linking correct
>
>
> Harm,
>
>
>
> https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/42315/lilypond-to-musicxml-to-sibelius#73706
>
> <https://music.stackexchan
ssage: 2
> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 11:49:29 +0200
> From: Jan-Peter Voigt
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Export from LilyPond to MusicXML (Thomas Morley)
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Hello Peter,
> yes, I still receive the messages
Thanks very much Harm, but as I no longer need it, I shan't go ahead. If I need
it later I'll resurrect this thread.
The reason I like Jan-Peter's approach is that it appears to abstract the music
from the details of presentation. But I've not looked into it much.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto
Harm,
Le 07/10/2021 à 11:46, Thomas Morley a écrit :
Not sure Jan-Peter's approach is the best method ...
What makes you think so?
Best,
Jean
Am Do., 7. Okt. 2021 um 13:32 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
>
> Harm,
>
> Le 07/10/2021 à 11:46, Thomas Morley a écrit :
> > Not sure Jan-Peter's approach is the best method ...
>
> What makes you think so?
>
> Best,
> Jean
Maybe my wording was misleading.
I tested ly->musicxml with
(1) openlilyl
Le 07/10/2021 à 22:51, Thomas Morley a écrit :
Am Do., 7. Okt. 2021 um 13:32 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
Harm,
Le 07/10/2021 à 11:46, Thomas Morley a écrit :
Not sure Jan-Peter's approach is the best method ...
What makes you think so?
Best,
Jean
Maybe my wording was misleading.
I tes
Hello Thomas,
> Le 7 oct. 2021 à 22:51, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>
> Am Do., 7. Okt. 2021 um 13:32 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra
> :
>>
>> Harm,
>>
>> Le 07/10/2021 à 11:46, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>>> Not sure Jan-Peter's approach is the best method ...
>>
>> What makes you think so?
>>
>> Be
;>
>> Peter
>>
>> mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com <mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com>
>>
>> www.ptoye.com <https://www.ptoye.com>
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Wednesday, October 6, 2021, 8:05:12 PM, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
Hi all,
probably what I am writing now is not new to most of you. About a year
ago there was a discussion regarding the license of Lilypond, triggered
by Urs' question about the future of OLL. Again and again the
documentation was referred to, which says that Lilypond is a compiler
that translates
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
> Hi all,
>
> probably what I am writing now is not new to most of you. About a year
> ago there was a discussion regarding the license of Lilypond, triggered
> by Urs' question about the future of OLL. Again and again the
> documentation was referred to, which says that L
> Am 08.10.2021 um 12:04 schrieb David Kastrup :
>
> Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> probably what I am writing now is not new to most of you. About a year
>> ago there was a discussion regarding the license of Lilypond, triggered
>> by Urs' question about the future of OLL. Again
Everyone will agree having not only musicxml2ly but also a Lilypond to
MusicXML converter would be cool.
I remember a similar discussion some time ago in the Mup mailing list. The
Mup developers from Arkkra Enterprises were saying it would probably be
less work to add musicxml export as an
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:18:54PM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
> Could this also be true for Lilypond ? Would it be better/easier to have
> a --musicxml output option ( just like --png --ps and --pdf ) instead of
> a separate application that has to be written from scratch ? Maybe then
> the
On Saturday 06 February 2010 16:18:54 Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
> Everyone will agree having not only musicxml2ly but also a Lilypond to
> MusicXML converter would be cool.
Absolutely. The only problem is who will develop it? I don't have the time for
such a task, but rather creat
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 07:12:59PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> However, there is also a practical problem: How do you check the
> quality of your export? There are so many things in the MusicXML
> "specification" that are left unclear, and the typical advice on
> the MusicXML mailing list is
On Sunday 07 February 2010 20:40:55 you wrote:
> MusicXML isn't a standard at all. If you have to say "umm, dunno,
> look at what this other piece of software does", it's not a
> standard.
Just to make things clear: It's not so bad. It's just impossible to write a
full specification for musical
Personally I would already be quite happy if Lilypond would only be able
to export the most basic information like staffs, clefs, keys, notes, and
beamings. More detailed and/or complex details I would then add manually
in the software that I use to import the exported musicxml. Even that
wou
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:45:58AM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>
> But the main problem remains: Lilypond developers are also very happy
> Lilypond users, which could explain the lack of motivation to put a lot
> of time and effort exporting to a format that only people who do NOT use
> Li
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:45:58AM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
But the main problem remains: Lilypond developers are also very happy
Lilypond users, which could explain the lack of motivation to put a lot
of time and effort exporting to a format
You can get started with a reasonable MusicXML import project for as little as
a US $10 investment in Finale NotePad. For a MusicXML export project, just
download a free Finale demo. Recordare does not make any money from either the
sales or downloads of MakeMusic products.
The Finale products
- Original Message
> From: Graham Percival
> To: Martin Tarenskeen
> Cc: lilypond-user mailinglist
> Sent: Mon, February 8, 2010 6:51:26 AM
> Subject: Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond
> conversion suite)
>
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:45:58AM
34 matches
Mail list logo
