Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-08-06 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mats, you wrote, Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:26 PM Trevor Daniels wrote: So, for the example in question, the NR should certainly state categorically what the voice names are in the various constructs, and examples showing the differences would be fine. But I don't think there is any need

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-08-06 Thread Mats Bengtsson
TECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Paul Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "LilyPond User" Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:47 AM Subject: Re: lyrics following split voices 2008/8/5 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'm surprised that nobody answered exac

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-08-06 Thread Trevor Daniels
ection on Contexts. What do you think? Trevor - Original Message - From: "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Paul Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "LilyPond Us

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-08-05 Thread Francisco Vila
2008/8/5 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm surprised that nobody answered exactly this question. If you name your > main voice "1", then the upper voice of the <<{...} \\ {...} >> construct > will stay the same Voice context as the single voice. That's true, it is explained in LM 3.2.1 I'm

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-08-05 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Paul Scott wrote: What are workable explicit names for either the lyrics or the voices to connect the voices in the parallel part to some lyrics? I'm surprised that nobody answered exactly this question. If you name your main voice "1", then the upper voice of the <<{...} \\ {...} >> cons

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-07-29 Thread Francisco Vila
2008/7/29 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No, No to what? :) > Francisco Vila wrote: > 2008/7/27 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Is there a relationship between '\new Voice = "1"' and '\voiceOne' ? > No, except for your convenience. The name you give to a voice is > fre

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-07-29 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
No, \voiceOne just changes the stem direction an dthings like that. \new Voice ="1" creates a new voice context that can be simultaneous with other voice contexts: << \new Voice = "1" { ... } \new Voice = "2" { ... } >> The implicit polyphony operator: << { ... } \\ { ... } >> will essentially d

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-07-29 Thread Francisco Vila
2008/7/27 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is there a relationship between '\new Voice = "1"' and '\voiceOne' ? No, except for your convenience. The name you give to a voice is freely choosen, and the "One" in voiceOne is just an internal name to the first voice, not usable by you as such (voic

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-07-27 Thread Paul Scott
Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Paul, > >> When I use << { } \\ { } >> without voice naming to show note variations >> in different verses of a song the parallel music gets skipped by the >> lyrics. I have read all the relevant 2.11 docs without finding a way to >> name the voices so that the lyrics

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-07-27 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Paul, When I use << { } \\ { } >> without voice naming to show note variations in different verses of a song the parallel music gets skipped by the lyrics. I have read all the relevant 2.11 docs without finding a way to name the voices so that the lyrics get attached to the parallel mus

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-07-27 Thread James E. Bailey
Am 27.07.2008 um 11:04 schrieb Paul Scott: Trevor Daniels wrote: Paul Scott wrote Sunday, July 27, 2008 4:01 AM Hi, When I use << { } \\ { } >> without voice naming to show note variations in different verses of a song the parallel music gets skipped by the lyrics. I have read all the

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-07-27 Thread James E. Bailey
Am 27.07.2008 um 11:04 schrieb Paul Scott: Trevor Daniels wrote: Paul Scott wrote Sunday, July 27, 2008 4:01 AM Hi, When I use << { } \\ { } >> without voice naming to show note variations in different verses of a song the parallel music gets skipped by the lyrics. I have read all the

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-07-27 Thread Paul Scott
Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Paul Scott wrote Sunday, July 27, 2008 4:01 AM > > >> Hi, >> >> When I use << { } \\ { } >> without voice naming to show note variations >> in different verses of a song the parallel music gets skipped by the >> lyrics. I have read all the relevant 2.11 docs without findi

Re: lyrics following split voices

2008-07-27 Thread Trevor Daniels
Paul Scott wrote Sunday, July 27, 2008 4:01 AM Hi, When I use << { } \\ { } >> without voice naming to show note variations in different verses of a song the parallel music gets skipped by the lyrics. I have read all the relevant 2.11 docs without finding a way to name the voices so that the

lyrics following split voices

2008-07-26 Thread Paul Scott
Hi, When I use << { } \\ { } >> without voice naming to show note variations in different verses of a song the parallel music gets skipped by the lyrics. I have read all the relevant 2.11 docs without finding a way to name the voices so that the lyrics get attached to the parallel music. Any ide