Re: mention canceled releases on website? (was: status of release 2.16.0)

2012-05-21 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:05AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock >> wrote: >> > Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website. >> >> I'm not happy with this practice, either. > > I eager

Re: mention canceled releases on website? (was: status of release 2.16.0)

2012-05-19 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:05AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock wrote: > > Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website. > > I'm not happy with this practice, either. I eagerly await your patch. If it looks ok I'll tell you to push directly t

mention canceled releases on website? (was: status of release 2.16.0)

2012-05-19 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock wrote: > According to this list: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list > > it looks like critical issues were found. Yes, they were. > Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website. I'm not happy with this practice, either. On the o