I've noticed for awhile that the mi shaped notehead is wider than the other shaped noteheads. This creates some rather unattractive misalignments when stacked with the "do" notehead, for instance:
\relative c' { \key c \major \aikenHeads <c e>1 <c e>2 <c e>4 } I don't really know much about Metafont or compiling the fonts, but I was looking through some of the mf source code and I noticed that all the other solfa noteheads have code like this: save do_weight; do_weight := 2; But for the mi notehead, this code appears: save mi_weight, mi_width; mi_weight := 2; mi_width := 1.2; Why is there a "mi_width" variable being used here when not in the other shape definitions? In all the other examples of shaped notes I have, the noteheads are the same width, regardless of shape, and the do and mi noteheads touch points. Cheers, Carl
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user