2009/5/20 Graham Percival :
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:48:58AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> I've always thought that pushing against the fingerboard created a fixed end
>> to the string, while just touching the string created a node. Perhaps the
>> "pulling the string towards the arm" te
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:48:58AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> I've always thought that pushing against the fingerboard created a fixed end
> to the string, while just touching the string created a node. Perhaps the
> "pulling the string towards the arm" technique creates enough force that
On 5/20/09 10:41 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:19:47AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>
> Nonsense. You can push down a string without a fingerboard... ok,
> granted this *really* makes the "ideal string" calculations
> questionable, since you're changing the
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:19:47AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 5/20/09 9:20 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > Oh, come on! There's no theoretical maximum frequency of a violin
> > string[1]. Just start on the G string and slide up. ;)
In case anybody is wondering, the formula for
On 5/20/09 9:20 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:04:30AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>> I've played several orchestral pieces where the violin parts include
>> glissandi ranging over several strings.
>> Mahler Symphony no. 4 comes to my mind, for example. I'm stil
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:04:30AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> I've played several orchestral pieces where the violin parts include
> glissandi ranging over several strings.
> Mahler Symphony no. 4 comes to my mind, for example. I'm still uncertain
> on exactly how to play it, though, but
Mats and Jon, thank yoou for your comments,
I will \revert
Second, glissandos between different strings is - if not impossible
to play
- very seldom to find, so
to: glissandos between different strings are possible but there seems to
be no common
sense how to play :-)
I've played several o
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Neil Puttock wrote:
2009/5/16 Marc Hohl :
Second, glissandos between different strings is - if not impossible
to play
- very seldom to find, so
I've played several orchestral pieces where the violin parts include
glissandi ranging over several strings.
Mahler S
Neil Puttock wrote:
2009/5/16 Marc Hohl :
Second, glissandos between different strings is - if not impossible to play
- very seldom to find, so
I've played several orchestral pieces where the violin parts include
glissandi ranging over several strings.
Mahler Symphony no. 4 comes to
2009/5/16 Marc Hohl :
> Second, glissandos between different strings is - if not impossible to play
> - very seldom to find, so
Good point; I hadn't considered that. :)
> I would prefer the 0.75-version.
Yep, it's much more pleasing, and makes the code simpler.
Regards,
Neil
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/5/15 Marc Hohl :
I still don't get it - when I use extra-dy = 0, I get glissando lines
parallel to the staff lines,
so a value of zero can't be right. I have attached the pdf output, the
upmost tab lie is the
standard behaviour, the middle line is extra-dy = 0, and
2009/5/15 Marc Hohl :
> I still don't get it - when I use extra-dy = 0, I get glissando lines
> parallel to the staff lines,
> so a value of zero can't be right. I have attached the pdf output, the
> upmost tab lie is the
> standard behaviour, the middle line is extra-dy = 0, and the lowest line i
2009/5/14 Marc Hohl :
> Neil Puttock schrieb:
>> This will apply an extra-dy of 1 for glissandos which aren't on the
>> same staff-position.
>>
>>
>
> No, it doesn't; at least in my test files. I have attached an example where
> the
> default and the corrected behaviour are compared, please have a
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/5/11 Marc Hohl :
(if (and (= left-staff-position right-staff-position)
(< (ly:pitch-semitones right-pitch) (ly:pitch-semitones
left-pitch)))
-1
1 )))
This will apply an extra-dy of 1 for glissandos which aren't o
2009/5/11 Marc Hohl :
> (if (and (= left-staff-position right-staff-position)
> (< (ly:pitch-semitones right-pitch) (ly:pitch-semitones
> left-pitch)))
> -1
> 1 )))
This will apply an extra-dy of 1 for glissandos which aren't on the
same staff-positio
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/5/10 Marc Hohl :
And here's my solution for tablature:
#(define (glissando::calc-tab-extra-dy grob)
(let* ((original (ly:grob-original grob))
(left-bound (ly:spanner-bound original LEFT))
(right-bound (ly:spanner-bound original RIGHT))
(le
2009/5/10 Marc Hohl :
> And here's my solution for tablature:
>
> #(define (glissando::calc-tab-extra-dy grob)
> (let* ((original (ly:grob-original grob))
> (left-bound (ly:spanner-bound original LEFT))
> (right-bound (ly:spanner-bound original RIGHT))
> (left-pitch (ly:ev
2009/5/10 Marc Hohl :
> I came up with the following definition:
>
> #(define (glissando::calc-extra-dy grob)
> (let* ((original (ly:grob-original grob))
> (left-bound (ly:spanner-bound original LEFT))
> (right-bound (ly:spanner-bound original RIGHT))
> (left-pitch (ly:eve
Marc Hohl schrieb:
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/5/9 Marc Hohl :
I tried to receive the informations needed by overriding the Glissando
#'stencil with
a function which simply displays the values obtained by the
ly:spanner-bound
call
before calling ly:line-spanner::print, but I get only #Note
Werner LEMBERG schrieb:
I came up with the following definition: [...]
and it works!
Mhmm, not perfect: There should be a dx correction to avoid an overlap
between the glissando line and the accidental.
Werner
Yes, I know, but I concentrated on item (2); see the start of this
> I came up with the following definition: [...]
>
> and it works!
Mhmm, not perfect: There should be a dx correction to avoid an overlap
between the glissando line and the accidental.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.or
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/5/9 Marc Hohl :
I tried to receive the informations needed by overriding the Glissando
#'stencil with
a function which simply displays the values obtained by the ly:spanner-bound
call
before calling ly:line-spanner::print, but I get only # on
the terminal.
What a
2009/5/9 Marc Hohl :
> I tried to receive the informations needed by overriding the Glissando
> #'stencil with
> a function which simply displays the values obtained by the ly:spanner-bound
> call
> before calling ly:line-spanner::print, but I get only # on
> the terminal.
>
> What am I doing wro
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/5/2 Marc Hohl :
I have made some observations concerning \glissando:
1) accidentals are not recognised properly; I know this is in the bug list
and there are workarounds,
see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-08/msg00235.html
This isn't at
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/5/2 Marc Hohl :
I have made some observations concerning \glissando:
1) accidentals are not recognised properly; I know this is in the bug list
and there are workarounds,
see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-08/msg00235.html
This isn't at
2009/5/2 Marc Hohl :
> I have made some observations concerning \glissando:
>
> 1) accidentals are not recognised properly; I know this is in the bug list
> and there are workarounds,
> see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-08/msg00235.html
This isn't at all straightforward to f
See if anything here helps:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-internals/Glissando#Glissando
Also search the archives for glissando and bound-details - the answer
is in there.
Good luck!
Neil
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> I have made some observation
I have made some observations concerning \glissando:
1) accidentals are not recognised properly; I know this is in the bug
list and there are workarounds,
see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-08/msg00235.html
2) the glissando line between half steps should indicate the dir
28 matches
Mail list logo
