On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 7:10 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> You want to position the 'f' sign into the staff lines of the upper
> staff? If yes, then it doesn't fit with the concept of a a `Dynamics`
> context *between* the staves IMHO. Instead, I would attach the 'f'
> sign to the upper staff,
> Interestingly, the following does *not* work, [...]
It's not clear to me how the end result should look like.
> The dynamics context doesn't know that there's a staff above it
> and/ot the piano staff forbids the dynamics from encroaching on the
> staff above.
You want to position the 'f'
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 8:58 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Since version 2.25.13 the NR contains the attached warning box.
>
Thank you, Werner. Interestingly, the following does *not* work, but I can
kind of understand why. The dynamics context doesn't know that there's a
staff above it and/ot
>> > So why would overriding the dynamic line spanner's
>> > outside-staff-priority change where the forte goes? Isn't it
>> > DynamicText? If anyone can clear this up for me, I would be very
>> > appreciative.
>>
>> When there are consecutive dynamics like \p \< ... \f \> ... \pp,
>> they need
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 6:33 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> > So why would overriding the dynamic line spanner's outside-staff-priority
> > change where the forte goes? Isn't it DynamicText? If anyone can clear
> this
> > up for me, I would be very appreciative.
>
> When there are consecutive
> So why would overriding the dynamic line spanner's outside-staff-priority
> change where the forte goes? Isn't it DynamicText? If anyone can clear this
> up for me, I would be very appreciative.
When there are consecutive dynamics like \p \< ... \f \> ... \pp, they
need to be all vertically
I am confused. While trying to find a way to move a forte mark up onto the
staff, I came across some very counter-intuitive code:
%%%
\version "2.24.3"
{
% Why does this work...
\once \override DynamicLineSpanner.outside-staff-priority = ##f
\once \override DynamicLineSpanner.Y-offset =
.n5.nabble.com/Moving-dynamics-away-from-the-staff-tp147945p147956.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Original Message -
From: Eluze elu...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Moving dynamics away from the staff
Phil Holmes wrote
Is there a way of shifting dynamics away from the staff when you're using
a
dynamics context?
have
Is there a way of shifting dynamics away from the staff when you're using a
dynamics context?
\new Score {
\new Staff \relative c'' {
c4 c c c |
c c c c |
}
\new Dynamics {
\override DynamicLineSpanner.staff-padding = #20
s4 s \f s s
\override DynamicLineSpanner.staff-padding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We had a similar discussion already last August, but this question was not
raised back then:
There are ways to move dynamics to the left/right, let it fall down towards
the staff, once it has left the skyline of the note, or even move the dynamic
2009/4/20 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com:
Is there any way to position a dynamic sign at an explicit staff-relative (not
note-relative) vertical position?
Since the dynamic's X-parent is the notehead, you can normalize its
position by retrieving the notehead's Y-offset:
2009/4/20 Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com:
2009/4/20 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com:
Is there any way to position a dynamic sign at an explicit staff-relative
(not
note-relative) vertical position?
Since the dynamic's X-parent is the notehead, you can normalize its
position by
On 4/20/09 3:11 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
Is there any way to position a dynamic sign at an explicit staff-relative (not
note-relative) vertical position?
Here's a hack that uses staff-padding together with a change in the Y-extent
that makes it work.
However,
On 4/20/09 4:32 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/20 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com:
Is there any way to position a dynamic sign at an explicit staff-relative
(not
note-relative) vertical position?
Since the dynamic's X-parent is the notehead, you can
In vocal music, the dynamics are typically placed above the staff, but for
very high notes, they are shifted left of the note (and down, sometimes even
inside the staff) to preserve vertical space.
Unfortunately, I'm not able to achieve this in the current 2.11 tree: Whatever
I do, the staff
2007/12/18, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I always remove the old version first when upgrading,
don't remember if it's strictly necessary but I think so.
Yes, on install it refuses to continue if it finds an older version installed.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
Gilles THIBAULT wrote:
Just one question about version 2.11.x:
Do You know, if it runs stable in Windows XP?
The 2.11.34 is very stable and works very well.
From this version (2.11.35, 2.11.36), some fonts problems in XP. (see
previous users messages)
You forgot to tell where to find this
Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear Gilles,
You wrote
You forgot to tell where to find this release. I's not linked from
any
public web page, but all old Windows releases are available at
http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/
Thanks for Your tip! but one question:
Do I have to
Dear Mats,
sorry, I thought the information I gave was enough.
Below I woll quote the complete file.
The problem is:
I can't move the dynamic vertically.
I tried it with different contexts in the override commando, but
without any success. Ans the crescendo has now disappeared, I dont
know why.
Daer Mats,
thank You. I've read Your e-mail and the text of the link and I think
I can understand the most much better and I was able to make the
changes I wanted.
Just one question about version 2.11.x:
Do You know, if it runs stable in Windows XP?
Thanks
Stefan
Mats Bengtsson schrieb am
Just one question about version 2.11.x:
Do You know, if it runs stable in Windows XP?
The 2.11.34 is very stable and works very well.
From this version (2.11.35, 2.11.36), some fonts problems in XP. (see
previous users messages)
Gilles.
___
Dear Lilypondusers,
I have a problem with moving the dynamics generally. I dont't
understand why this doesnt make any effect:
dynamik = { \override DynamicLineSpanner #'padding = #-2.0 \override
DynamicText #'padding =#2.1
s1\f s1*10 s1\setTextCresc s1*3 s1\ff}
\score {
\new PianoStaff \new
If you tell what you want to achieve, it's much easier to
provide a relevant answer. Also, it helps if the example
code you include in your email can be compiled as it is.
However, as far as I can remember, there's no point in
specifying a padding value less than 0. Also, I hope you
have noticed
Am I supposed to do something like this to move my
dynamics down on the page? This thing has me beat.
\layout{\context{\Staff \set
DynamicLineSpanner #'staff-padding = #-5}}
Cheers,
Stewart
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Which version of the manual have you been looking in?
In the section on Dynamics in the manual, you can find a working
example (at least in the manual for version 2.8).
/Mats
Stewart Holmes wrote:
Am I supposed to do something like this to move my dynamics down on
the page? This thing has
Hi,
I'm sure that I've seen conversations on this subject recenly but I'll be
darned if I can find it in the archives so sorry if I'm covering old ground.
I have some dynamics (f, ff etc) which collide with slurs above and I want to
move them down. There doesn't seem to be a padding option or
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm sure that I've seen conversations on this subject recenly but I'll be
darned if I can find it in the archives so sorry if I'm covering old ground.
I have some dynamics (f, ff etc) which collide with slurs above and I want to
move them
28 matches
Mail list logo
