Am Mo., 6. Mai 2019 um 03:56 Uhr schrieb Davide Liessi
:
>
> Dear all,
>
> in the following example I expected to see two identical scores, but
> in the first one the full bar rests after the rehearsal mark are not
> compressed.
>
> \version "2.19.82"
>
> \score {
> \compressMMRests
> \new
Dear all,
in the following example I expected to see two identical scores, but
in the first one the full bar rests after the rehearsal mark are not
compressed.
\version "2.19.82"
\score {
\compressMMRests
\new Staff <<
{
s1*5
\mark \default
}
{
c'1
R1*10
, but I do hope so ...
Best
Urs
Am 10.11.2014 18:47, schrieb Urs Liska:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get the combination of consecutive MultiMeasureRests
working but got stuck.
I have the function combineMMRests from
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/new-snippet-combine-multimeasure-rests
from
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/new-snippet-combine-multimeasure-rests-td144688.html
which works pretty well usually, but it doesn't merge rests when
something is between them, even if that something is actually
nothing.
Consider the attached files.
Uncommenting one of the lines
On Nov 11, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
No idea anybody?
I think I can narrow down the question even more:
Running the attached file gives
(make-music (quote Music))
on the command line. So what I need seems to be a test that
Am 11.11.2014 09:32, schrieb Mike Solomon:
On Nov 11, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
mailto:u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
No idea anybody?
I think I can narrow down the question even more:
Running the attached file gives
(make-music (quote Music))
on the command line.
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/new-snippet-combine-multimeasure-rests-td144688.html
which works pretty well usually, but it doesn't merge rests when
something is between them, even if that something is actually
nothing.
Consider the attached files.
Uncommenting one of the lines
Hi Urs,
Sorry I haven’t been following this… but isn’t this much like
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-12/msg01085.html?
I can’t remember how far Keith got — but there might be something there to look
at.
Best,
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan, composer
Am 11.11.2014 16:48, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Urs,
Sorry I haven’t been following this… but isn’t this much like
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-12/msg01085.html?
I can’t remember how far Keith got — but there might be something there to look
at.
Best,
Kieren.
there might be something there to look at.
In particular, consider the snippet:
\version 2.19
#(define (append-merge x l r)
Add x to the head of list l, merging skips,
and if r is true also merging full measure rests.
(if (and (pair? l)
(ly:music? x)
(ly:music? (car
Hi Urs,
I also have some ideas about options for a more manual approach to line
breaking (partially from seeing how easy it is tto push stuff around with
Amadeus).
1. I would love to see Amadeus in action!
2. broken record alert! Using Jan-Peter’s \editionEngraver makes pushing
stuff
Am 11.11.2014 17:26, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Urs,
I also have some ideas about options for a more manual approach to line
breaking (partially from seeing how easy it is tto push stuff around with
Amadeus).
1. I would love to see Amadeus in action!
Me too (actually I did *not* see it
Hi Urs,
Me too (actually I did *not* see it but was only told by a power-user (I
think you know who I mean).
I do. =)
If you come over here I'll get us an appointment in Munich for a
demonstration ;-)
I would love that!
My intention was more in the direction of
Hi all,
I'm trying to get the combination of consecutive MultiMeasureRests
working but got stuck.
I have the function combineMMRests from
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/new-snippet-combine-multimeasure-rests-td144688.html
which works pretty well usually, but it doesn't merge rests
No idea anybody?
Urs
Am 20.09.2014 15:22, schrieb Urs Liska:
Hi,
when writing parts with merged multimeasure rests like
{
\compressFullBarRests
R1*5
R1*4
}
will result in _two_ compressed multimeasure rests with 5 and 4 bars
respectively. I know this can be quite useful to structure
Probably this may help:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/new-snippet-combine-multimeasure-rests-td144688.html
I haven't Lilypond at hand at the moment.
Regards,
Helge
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
11:07, schrieb Helge Kruse:
Probably this may help:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/new-snippet-combine-multimeasure-rests-td144688.html
I haven't Lilypond at hand at the moment.
Regards,
Helge
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user
Oh, oops! Fixed that in the new version. Other changes:
* Added a wrapper function to recurse down nested music expressions, so it
can now be called on arbitrary music expressions.
* It now combines spacer rests as well as multimeasure rests, to help with
things like \global \music
* Bar checks
I just finished writing my first Scheme extension for Lilypond! It is a
function to take a sequential music expression and condense consecutive
multimeasure rests into a single multimeasure rest. Since this is my first
attempt at Scheme, I'd love suggestions on how to improve it. One thing I'd
Shevek s...@saultobin.com writes:
I just finished writing my first Scheme extension for Lilypond! It is a
function to take a sequential music expression and condense consecutive
multimeasure rests into a single multimeasure rest. Since this is my first
attempt at Scheme, I'd love suggestions
I am finding that there are many situations in which it is useful for me to
insert a tagged command in the midst of a block multimeasure rest, for
example to manually set the partcombine mode. When I extract the individual
parts, though, I need to be able to consolidate multimeasure rests except
At Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:31:08 +0800,
James Harkins wrote:
the cadenzaToMusic-function _replaces_ \cadenzaOn and \cadenzaOff.
If you delete these commands it works and there is no need for manual bars:
Ah, OK, I didn't get the replacing part. Thanks for clarifying.
I have a deadline for
Am 9. April 2012 04:26 schrieb James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com:
At Sun, 8 Apr 2012 09:39:13 -0500,
David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi James,
Possibly the following thread will be useful to you:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg68492.html
Thanks, this is a lot closer. (By the
Hello,
On 9 April 2012 11:03, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 9. April 2012 04:26 schrieb James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com:
At Sun, 8 Apr 2012 09:39:13 -0500,
David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi James,
Possibly the following thread will be useful to you:
At Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:03:05 +0200,
Thomas Morley wrote:
Am 9. April 2012 04:26 schrieb James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com:
It's closer -- I'm now getting bar check failures only at the ends of the
two cadenzas, where I think I was getting more of them before. But, it's
still failing and
Hi,
I am perfectly ripping my hair out trying to get multimeasure rests to display
properly in another staff, over a cadenza. Reduced example illustrates.
I don't get the barcheck errors if I replace the mm-rests with spacers, but
then I don't get the whole-rest symbols in the empty bars
Hi James,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:22 AM, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am perfectly ripping my hair out trying to get multimeasure rests to
display properly in another staff, over a cadenza. Reduced example
illustrates.
Possibly the following thread will be useful
Am 8. April 2012 16:39 schrieb David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Possibly the following thread will be useful to you:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg68492.html
HTH,
David
Hi David,
you were faster. :))
-Harm
___
At Sun, 8 Apr 2012 09:39:13 -0500,
David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi James,
Possibly the following thread will be useful to you:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg68492.html
Thanks, this is a lot closer. (By the way, it seems that mail-archive is on the
wrong side of the Great
Dear community,
because I'm awfully bad in mathematics I wrote a function for calculating
the correct length of multimeasure rests.
Although it doesn't cause a crash (which is a huge sucess for me as a
programmer), it doesn't work as expected. Instead of showing one goupt of
multimeasure rests
Stefan Thomas kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com writes:
Dear community,
because I'm awfully bad in mathematics I wrote a function for
calculating the correct length of multimeasure rests.
Although it doesn't cause a crash (which is a huge sucess for me as a
programmer), it doesn't work
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Stefan Thomas kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com writes:
Dear community,
because I'm awfully bad in mathematics I wrote a function for
calculating the correct length of multimeasure rests.
Although it doesn't cause a crash (which is a huge sucess for me
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 05:13:57 -0400
From: Hwaen Ch'uqi hwaench...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Regarding \break and multimeasure rests.
Message-ID:
CAFRM3_2Ly4Ag-B11xCF18xY1pJkv-Eb_=h6g2ckcvdy-eb7...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso
Hi,
I'm asking again about my most challenging cosmetic problem with Lily:
How can I create/place tempo indications in a score/parts so that the
instruments that have multi-measure rests at that point in the music
have the tempo indications left justified like the parts which have
notes at
Hi Paul,
I'm asking again about my most challenging cosmetic problem with Lily:
How can I create/place tempo indications in a score/parts so that the
instruments that have multi-measure rests at that point in the music have the
tempo indications left justified like the parts which have
On 07/23/2010 03:35 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Paul,
I'm asking again about my most challenging cosmetic problem with
Lily: How can I create/place tempo indications in a score/parts so
that the instruments that have multi-measure rests at that point in
the music have the tempo indications
Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:58adba261003092132h7283d8d9v980ca4a3c2ed4...@mail.gmail.com...
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
\override RhythmicStaff.MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position = #0.01
Thanks. That works great.
Now I
Jay Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
\override RhythmicStaff.MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position = #0.01
Thanks. That works great.
Now I just have to deal with
\context{\RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext} killing my settings. I
On 7 March 2010 22:21, Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com wrote:
\version 2.13.15
\new RhythmicStaff
{
%\override Staff.MultiMeasureRest #'extra-offset = #'(0 . -1)
R1
}
Of course this doesn't quite work because
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
\override RhythmicStaff.MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position = #0.01
Thanks. That works great.
Now I just have to deal with
\context{\RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext} killing my settings. I
remember following the discussion
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com wrote:
\version 2.13.15
\new RhythmicStaff
{
%\override Staff.MultiMeasureRest #'extra-offset = #'(0 . -1)
R1
}
Of course this doesn't quite work because all multi measure rests are
moved and not just single whole measure
Hello,
Consider:
\version 2.13.10
{
\compressFullBarRests
\override MultiMeasureRest #'expand-limit = #2
\override MultiMeasureRest #'minimum-length = #20
R1*16
R1*16
R1*16
}
It doesn't really matter what numbers you use here, but I wonder if
anyone could tell me how I can get
I haven't checked. But this may be related to issue #917.
On 26.01.2010, at 19:47, James Lowe wrote:
Hello,
Consider:
\version 2.13.10
{
\compressFullBarRests
\override MultiMeasureRest #'expand-limit = #2
\override MultiMeasureRest #'minimum-length = #20
R1*16
R1*16
R1*16
}
It
2009/4/3 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
Looking further for a solution, we saw that the definition of textLengthOn
textLengthOn = {
\override TextScript #'extra-spacing-width = #'(0 . 0)
\override TextScript #'extra-spacing-height = #'(-inf.0 . +inf.0)
}
now the problem is to
2009/4/2 Paul Scott psl...@ultrasw.com:
version 2,21,2
When creating a score and parts I have not found a reliable way to cause
markup like tempo indications to always appear at the left side of a measure
even when a particular part has a multimeasure rest at that location.
s1*0^\markup and
version 2,21,2
When creating a score and parts I have not found a reliable way to cause
markup like tempo indications to always appear at the left side of a
measure even when a particular part has a multimeasure rest at that
location.
s1*0^\markup and \tempo and left-align don't
Hello all,
I'm trying to add some carefully-positioned markup above a multimeasure rest
by attaching it to a spacer within the rest (s8^\markup {} R1*15/16*2). But
the presence of the spacer alters the horizontal spacing routine of the
multimeasure rest.
Is there a way to convince the
What LilyPond version do you use? Some aspects of this problem have
been fixed fairly recently and perhaps only in the development versions
2.11.x.
/Mats
Quoting Neil Thornock [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello all,
I'm trying to add some carefully-positioned markup above a multimeasure rest
by
In 2.11.37 it seems that trying to get left aligned text over
multimeasure rests only works under some conditions. In the following
example only the first case is left aligned. This is what I am
observing in my real examples.
\version 2.11.37
\new Staff
{
\set Score.skipBars = ##t
s4*0
multimeasure rests
In 2.11.37 it seems that trying to get left
aligned text over
multimeasure rests only works under some
conditions. In the following
example only the first case is left aligned.
This is what I am
observing in my real examples.
\version 2.11.37
\new Staff
{
\set
to get left aligned text over
multimeasure rests only works under some conditions. In the following
example only the first case is left aligned. This is what I am
observing in my real examples.
\version 2.11.37
\new Staff
{
\set Score.skipBars = ##t
s4*0^first R1*2
s4*0^second R1*2
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Paul
Release 11 differs from release 10 in this respect. IIRC
release 10 expanded a bar to accommodate text attached to a
skip note in a multi-measure rest bar. The R11 NR now says
at the end of 1.2.2, Writing rests:
...
Long text is better attached to a
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
If you replace the spacing note with an ordinary note, you see better
what happens.
If you then keep playing around with the example, you will notice that
it's the *0
that's the culprit. If you use s4^... instead, the result looks much
better.
Thanks. It does look much
=treda.co.u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Paul Scott
Sent: 06 January 2008 07:58
To: lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: markup at the left of multimeasure rests
This subject used to be documented but doesn't
seem to be in the 2.11.37
doc's. It also doesn't seem to work as it did at one time
This subject used to be documented but doesn't seem to be in the 2.11.37
doc's. It also doesn't seem to work as it did at one time
This is from the 2.4 manual which resulted from my Googling:
If you want to have a text on the left end of a multi-measure rest,
attach the text to a zero-length
Quoting Jack Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been having a problem generating multimeasure rests within
leadsheets, and until recently I made no serious attempt to figure
out what was going on. What I finally noticed is that lilypond
doesn't generate multimeasure rests when I use the chordnames
--- Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Jack Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been having a problem generating multimeasure rests within
leadsheets, and until recently I made no serious attempt to figure
out what was going on. What I finally noticed is that lilypond
doesn't
I've been having a problem generating multimeasure rests within
leadsheets, and until recently I made no serious attempt to figure
out what was going on. What I finally noticed is that lilypond
doesn't generate multimeasure rests when I use the chordnames context.
If I comment out the chordnames
Hi Steve:
I still do not understand how I can have the conductor score have
EMPTY measures
when the whole measure is a rest (but not hide the rests in
measures that have notes).
If you are correctly using full-measure rests (e.g., R1 instead of
r1), then the tip that was given earlier in
I think you are missing something very basic and I hope the following
example can help you realize how to use multimeasure rests.
It's always much easier to get relevant answers if you include
an example (preferably short but complete) of the LilyPond code you
have tried.
m = \relative c'{
c1
-
From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think you are missing something very basic and I hope the following
example can help you realize how to use multimeasure rests.
It's always much easier to get relevant answers if you include
an example (preferably short but complete
with the
multi-measure rest set to 12 bars, but then I want the next measure to be
numbered measure #13, not #2.
Is this a bug or is there a clever way around this that I can't think of?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/multimeasure-rests-with-proper-measure-numbering-tf4045634
, 2006 3:37 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Question about multimeasure rests
Hello,
Lylipond works fine, but I just have a little question : Is there a way to
control the printed length(in mm) of multimesure rest? (i.e., without doing
anything, a 20 measures rest can have the same length
Hello,
Lylipond works fine, but I just have a little question : Is there a way to
control the printed length(in mm) of multimesure rest? (i.e., without doing
anything, a 20 measures rest can have the same length as a 4 measures rest on
the printed score)
Could you help me?
Thank you,
K. Hakil
I'm currently cleaning up a file converted from 2.0.1 to 2.7.22. I'm
having trouble getting my MultiMeasure Rests the way I want them.
The original file had a line
\override MultiMeasureRest #'minimum-length = #21
I know this worked when I first typeset the piece, but that's no longer
Joe Neeman wrote:
This seems to be a bug in 2.7, but it can be fixed by adding
\override MultiMeasureRest #'springs-and-rods =
#Multi_measure_rest::set_spacing_rods
For what it's worth, the lack of this line also causes other
multimeasure rest bugs; I attach an example that is fixed with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I'm currently cleaning up a file converted from 2.0.1 to 2.7.22. I'm
having trouble getting my MultiMeasure Rests the way I want them.
The original file had a line
\override MultiMeasureRest #'minimum-length = #21
I know this worked
A question:
In music that is used by non-musicians, like for example hymnes in a songbook,
it is quite common to use a way of displaying multi measure rests (with skipBars
set to ##t), which are shorter than 10 measures in length, but display in
the same style as the display style shown by
Ruud van Silfhout wrote:
A question:
In music that is used by non-musicians, like for example hymnes in a songbook,
it is quite common to use a way of displaying multi measure rests (with skipBars
set to ##t), which are shorter than 10 measures in length, but display in
the same style as the
Hi all,
Anybody know how to do multimeasure rests with weird time signatures?
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
70 matches
Mail list logo
