Graham Percival wrote Saturday, April 25, 2009 12:53 PM
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:31:14PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, April 25, 2009 10:13 AM
Eh?!?! You want to tell people to put articulation and dynamic
marks after the duration, before they've been told
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:31:14PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Saturday, April 25, 2009 10:13 AM
>
>> Eh?!?! You want to tell people to put articulation and dynamic
>> marks after the duration, before they've been told how to do
>> articulations and dynamics? Remember t
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, April 25, 2009 10:13 AM
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 09:41:26AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, April 24, 2009 4:42 PM
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
If you have an idea for a gener
trevor, graham,
On 25 Apr 2009, at 10:41, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, April 24, 2009 4:42 PM
Hmm. I was initially thinking of 3.1.2, but that subsection
(actually, the entire section) is really talking about
*macroscopic* style. I mean, it refers back to the definition
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 09:41:26AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Friday, April 24, 2009 4:42 PM
>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
>>> Graham Percival wrote:
If you have an idea for a general clarification that the syntax is
"pitch
Graham Percival wrote Friday, April 24, 2009 4:42 PM
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
If you have an idea for a general clarification that the syntax
is
"pitch duration other", then I'm all for it. If it's a simple
"you need to put the '
On 4/24/09 4:22 PM, "Peter Chubb" wrote:
>
> I'd really appreciate an appendix or something that gives Lily syntax
> as BNF, or as a syntax diagram. The syntax is very complex, and I've
> been caught out a number of times by things not being as I expected
> them to be from the NR --- not th
> "Graham" == Graham Percival writes:
Graham> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
>> Graham Percival wrote:
>>> If you have an idea for a general clarification that the syntax is
>>> "pitch duration other", then I'm all for it. If it's a simple
>>> "you need to put
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> If you have an idea for a general clarification that the syntax is
>> "pitch duration other", then I'm all for it. If it's a simple
>> "you need to put the ' before the duration", then I'd probably
>> reject
