ok, panic resolved:
http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:20:40AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Yes, 5 or six maximum, I think. What if you prioritize and see
what falls off?
Mao. I forgot the most important rule of design: perfection is
Graham Percival wrote:
ok, panic resolved:
http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html
Nice.
All though I don't think 'contact' is a good header for the mailinglist
and stuff. Contact does me think about an person of companies address to
contact with.
'support' or
Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 03:50 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
ok, panic resolved:
Oh, you are using a good bit of content literally from the old
site, right? Would there be a way to be easy on the translators
by keeping some kind of @comment tag where the original text
came
Well, if translators used some translator tools like
http://www.omegat.org/ they would automatically recognize already
translated texts.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 03:50 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
ok, panic resolved:
Oh, you are using a
Good points about -devel and bug-. IMO if we don't advertize
info-lilypond, we should junk that list. :)
... I'm not arguing that we /shouldn't/ get rid of info. The
current webpage supports RSS, so if we dump the news items into
RSS, then people could get their instant notifications that
Le jeudi 25 juin 2009 à 03:50 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
Good points about -devel and bug-. IMO if we don't advertize
info-lilypond, we should junk that list. :)
I guess the email medium is preferred, or at least more used, by some
people than RSS, and this puts very little overhead on
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:56:21PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
All though I don't think 'contact' is a good header for the mailinglist
and stuff. Contact does me think about an person of companies address to
contact with.
'support' or 'community support' maybe?
The
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 03:11:29PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 03:50 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
ok, panic resolved:
Oh, you are using a good bit of content literally from the old
site, right? Would there be a way to be easy on the
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:46:04AM -0500, David R. Linn wrote:
Good points about -devel and bug-. IMO if we don't advertize
info-lilypond, we should junk that list. :)
Or for the people who happily use email and do *not* use RSS,
we could continue to make announcements by the working
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:36:05PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Le jeudi 25 juin 2009 à 03:50 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
Good points about -devel and bug-. IMO if we don't advertize
info-lilypond, we should junk that list. :)
I guess the email medium is preferred, or at least more
10 matches
Mail list logo
