Re: no line for textspanner

2010-08-06 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 06:01:15PM +0100, James wrote: > (seems an awful lot of work to just change a few lines in a snippet > though :( ). The idea is if we add a convert-ly rule, then any user files which include the old syntax can be automatically updated. The focus here is on the end-user,

Re: no line for textspanner

2010-08-06 Thread James
On 06/08/2010 17:41, Neil Puttock wrote: A convert rule is what convert-ly uses to update old .ly files. All the rules are contained in python/convertrules.py. A full LSR update (running makelsr.py on the docs tarball from LSR) calls convert-ly on all the snippets. I have no problems adding

Re: no line for textspanner

2010-08-06 Thread Neil Puttock
On 6 August 2010 17:31, James wrote: > I don't know what adding 'convert rule' means. :/ A convert rule is what convert-ly uses to update old .ly files. All the rules are contained in python/convertrules.py. A full LSR update (running makelsr.py on the docs tarball from LSR) calls convert-ly o

Re: no line for textspanner

2010-08-06 Thread James
On 06/08/2010 17:28, Neil Puttock wrote: On 6 August 2010 17:06, James wrote: I'll do this as I am working on this section anyway. OK, but only if you're going to add a convert rule (rather than editing the snippet), otherwise we'll have to add the snippet to snippets/new. Ah! I don't kno

Re: no line for textspanner

2010-08-06 Thread James
Hello, On 31/07/2010 18:44, Xavier Scheuer wrote: > 2010/7/31 Neil Puttock: > >> Or >> >> \override TextSpanner #'style = #'none >> >> from 2.13.24. > > Great! > > I remembered we had a discussion about this possibility with > DynamicTextSpanner but I did not know it was finally implemented. > Th

Re: no line for textspanner

2010-08-06 Thread Neil Puttock
On 6 August 2010 17:06, James wrote: > I'll do this as I am working on this section anyway. OK, but only if you're going to add a convert rule (rather than editing the snippet), otherwise we'll have to add the snippet to snippets/new. Cheers, Neil __

Re: no line for textspanner

2010-08-01 Thread Neil Puttock
On 31 July 2010 18:44, Xavier Scheuer wrote: > Maybe you could also modify the doc NR 1.3.1 Dynamics, the snippet > "Hiding the extender line for text dynamics", to replace > >  \override DynamicTextSpanner #'dash-period = #-1.0 > > by > >  \override DynamicTextSpanner #'style = #'none Thanks, I

Re: no line for textspanner

2010-07-31 Thread Xavier Scheuer
2010/7/31 Neil Puttock : > Or > > \override TextSpanner #'style = #'none > > from 2.13.24. Great! I remembered we had a discussion about this possibility with DynamicTextSpanner but I did not know it was finally implemented. Thank you Neil! Maybe you could also modify the doc NR 1.3.1 Dynamics,

Re: no line for textspanner

2010-07-31 Thread Neil Puttock
On 31 July 2010 13:12, Xavier Scheuer wrote: >  \override TextSpanner #'dash-period = #-1 Or \override TextSpanner #'style = #'none from 2.13.24. Cheers, Neil ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf

Re: no line for textspanner

2010-07-31 Thread Xavier Scheuer
2010/7/31 Stefan Thomas : > Dear community, > is it possible to get an invisible line for textspanners and if so, > how can it be done? Hi! Yes it is. \override TextSpanner #'dash-period = #-1 Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer ___ lilypond-user ma

no line for textspanner

2010-07-31 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear community, is it possible to get an invisible line for textspanners and if so, how can it be done? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user