> >However, I didn't find the exact cause of my second problem, where
> >the flags do not start at the very end of the stem, but are shifted
> >a little inwards...
Will have a look in the next days.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond
on 2008-07-24 at 19:33 Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>I think the angles (different angles for up/down stems!) and the
>lengths are okay, although they might still be fine-tuned a bit more.
i agree with both statements, IMHO it would be great if this patch
could be merged in upcoming releases.
>I'v
glad to see this important thread revived.
on 2008-07-24 at 08:14 madhg wrote:
>1) personally I like the flags in the first row of my June 17 message
>in this thread. As you say it's a matter of taste.
i'd like to promote the inclusion of TWO new flags, something like
straight-ancient and str
slurred examples). Here's
an example, Hässler 1779.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p18634681/grace-notes.jpg
I've clumsily drawn a slash:
http://www.nabble.com/file/p18634681/grace-notes-2.jpg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/not-so-ancient-flags-tp178
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 schrieb madhg:
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > There are currently three things that are bothering me:
> >
> > 1) What are the optimal values for the flag angle, the flag length (for
> > up/downstems), the flag thickness an
rough the facsimiles which I possess, I'd say that
grace-notes were tiny, did not have a slash through the stem, and were not
normally slurred to the following note. Here's an example:
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/not-so-ancient-flags-tp17872782p18634017.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 schrieb madhg:
> This thread has gone quiet, and I am wondering whether the new flags might
> be in a future lilypond version?
Sure, I'm currently just a little busy with the documentation... (and
switching between branch
This thread has gone quiet, and I am wondering whether the new flags might be
in a future lilypond version?
David (who started the ball rolling but doesn't have the technical ability
to contribute)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/not-so-ancient-
on 2008-06-28 at 14:53 Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>In your original images, the slant is somewhere betwen 40 and 45
>degrees... But I agree, that large slant does not look good. I prefer
>something like 30 degrees.
>About the length: I also agree that they look too short.
>I'll try to come up wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 20. Juni 2008 schrieb luis jure:
> another question: i find your flags a bit small (and too slanted)
In your original images, the slant is somewhere betwen 40 and 45 degrees...
But I agree, that large slant does not look good. I prefer so
on 2008-06-20 at 00:59 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>Usually yes. If you find good values, we can still check that later
>on to parameterize if needed.
thanks for your hints, werner, i'll try to find values to get as close
as possible to the scores of composers like stockhausen and boulez. if
i come u
> i guess i have to apply your patch (and werner's)
Only my patch.
> to the sources and recompile lilypond, right? is it OK to patch
> against 2.11.49 sources?
Yes.
> how can i modify the file to get what i want?
>
> +straight_flag_angle = -37;
> +straight_upflag_length# = .65 black_notehead_
on 2008-06-19 at 16:21 Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>Actually, adding different flags in lilypond is quite simple:
great, actually i've been wanting to ask this for a long time, but not
related to old notation styles but rather to more "contemporary"
practices. it has been quite common for the las
> Attached is a first attempt to do this, plus a sample file showing
> the new "straight", the "mensural" and the default flag styles.
Attached is a patch which fixes the metrics and glyph shapes so that
the straight flags convert nicely to PS outlines. IMHO, the shapes
are ready for inclusion n
Please respond to
lilypond-user@gnu.org
To
lilypond-user@gnu.org
cc
Subject
lilypond-user Digest, Vol 67, Issue 68
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: madhg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: not-so-ancient flags
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL
to my suggestion!
David Griffel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/not-so-ancient-flags-tp17872782p18010666.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
traightd5");
+ create_straight_flag_char (3, straight_downflag_length, straight_downflag_length#);
+ y_mirror_char;
+fet_endchar;
+
+
+fet_beginchar ("straight 64th (down)", "straightd6");
+ create_straight_flag_char (4, straight_downflag_length, straight_downflag_length#);
+ y_mirror_
Frescobaldi 1637 (Toccate... Libro Primo)
http://www.nabble.com/file/p17961525/Frescobaldi-flags.jpg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/not-so-ancient-flags-tp17872782p17961525.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
http://www.nabble.com/file/p17881566/T%25C3%25BCrk-beams.jpg
In fact, the much earlier CPE Bach doesn't do it like this; isolated 16ths
in a beamed group are treated in the same way as modern notation.
best wishes,
David Griffel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/n
2008/6/16 madhg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'm transcribing some early classical prints. They use flags which are
> bolder and clearer than modern flags - at least for 8ths and 16ths.
>
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p17872782/flags.jpg
>
> Would there be any interest in having this as another style o
#x27;s obviously not something urgent. I've no idea how much work
would be involved. If it's not too much, I might be interested in
sponsoring.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/not-so-ancient-flags-tp17872782p17872782.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mail
21 matches
Mail list logo
