Re: notehead offsets in single-staff polyphony

2008-09-24 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Mike, Incidentally Kieren are you related to Keith and/or Edward? Keith was the Chairman of the music dept. at Ottawa U when I was there. Well if you are my apologies - it's 'Ernest' not 'Edward' of course. I believe I saw both of them in a genealogy report years ago… but it's a pretty

Re: notehead offsets in single-staff polyphony

2008-09-24 Thread Mike Blackstock
Mike Blackstock wrote: Incidentally Kieren are you related to Keith and/or Edward? Keith was the Chairman of the music dept. at Ottawa U when I was there. Well if you are my apologies - it's 'Ernest' not 'Edward' of course. M. ___ lilypond-u

Re: notehead offsets in single-staff polyphony

2008-09-24 Thread Mike Blackstock
Ah, I see... so it's the dotted note that makes the difference in the 2 examples. Makes sense. I guess i didn't think of looking under 'Collision Resolution'. Thanks! Incidentally Kieren are you related to Keith and/or Edward? Keith was the Chairman of the music dept. at Ottawa U when I was t

Re: notehead offsets in single-staff polyphony

2008-09-24 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Mike, Is there something in the manual I've missed? merge-differently-dotted merge-differently-headed HTH! Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

notehead offsets in single-staff polyphony

2008-09-24 Thread Mike Blackstock
Guitar music has a lot of this stuff: \relative c' { << {g'16 d' b d} \\ {g,4} >> } where the G in the top part lines up with the G in the bottom and they share the same notehead; exactly as expected and wanted. However in this: \relative c' { \time 3/8 << {g'8 b d} \\