Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 11:36, Peter Crighton wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 23:40, Peter Crighton > wrote: > >> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 22:31, Jean Abou Samra wrote: >> >>> Silly me, the code was plain wrong. Here is a fixed version. >>> >> That works beautifully in my test file, thanks a lot!

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 23:40, Peter Crighton wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 22:31, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > >> Silly me, the code was plain wrong. Here is a fixed version. >> > That works beautifully in my test file, thanks a lot! I’ll test it more > tomorrow in my actual project and let you

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 22:31, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > Le 24/03/2021 à 22:06, Peter Crighton a écrit : > > Thank you. It fixes the error, so the score at least compiles again. But > it sadly also renders my use of \override > RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f useless. (Compare in my >

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

(my-priority (ly:grob-property grob 'outside-staff-priority))) (for-each (cute ly:pointer-group-interface::add-grob grob

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

? A change to the >> > multi-mark-engraver I could apply? A good alternative to >> > multi-mark-engraver? Another way to vertically level rehearsal marks >> > other than through disabling outside-staff-priority? >> >> If you want marks aligned on the same level

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

utside-staff-priority = ##f to > have all marks appear at the same vertical level (relative to the > chord symbols) and the multi-mark-engraver also in some way works with > outside-staff-priority, using the two together results in the error > Wrong type argumen

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

> > template use \override RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f to > > have all marks appear at the same vertical level (relative to the > > chord symbols) and the multi-mark-engraver also in some way works with > > outside-staff-priority, using the two together result

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

level (relative to the chord symbols) and the multi-mark-engraver also in some way works with outside-staff-priority, using the two together results in the error Wrong type argument in position 1: #f. Any ideas on how to get this working together? A change to the multi-mark-engraver I could apply?

multi-mark-engraver not working when outside-staff-priority set to false

multiple rehearsal marks at the same time. As I in my template use \override RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f to have all marks appear at the same vertical level (relative to the chord symbols) and the multi-mark-engraver also in some way works with outside-staff-priority, using the two together

Re: Problem with outside-staff-priority

Sorry for the redundant question. I forgot that I already obtained an answer for the same question (and I did not delete in my "how-to" list, meanwhile) http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Outside-staff-priority-and-vertical-order-of-grobs-td226058.html On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:3

Problem with outside-staff-priority

Hello, what's wrong in the following code? (tested on both 2.18 and 2,19) I would like that the Script grob appear below the other grobs, then I set the lowest value for its outside-staff-priority, but it appears above the TupletBracket. How can I fix this? Thanks, P % { \once

Outside-staff-priority ignored for OttavaBracket

{ \ottava #1 c'''8^>^\mf[(^\markup{ legato }\startTextSpan e'' f''' g''' e]} c4\stopTextSpan \ottava #0 c'') } %%% On 2.19.83 the SVG output produces a collision on the OttavaBracket, which is not placed at the right outside-staff-priority order. The PDF output is ok. Is there a w

Re: Outside staff priority

Ralph Palmer writes: > Greetings - > > I feel kind of stupid. I don't understand why the following four examples > all produce the same output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* > TextScripts? Neither are. They are both of type Script , not TextScript . That doesn't change the principal problem

Re: Outside staff priority

Kieren MacMillan wrote: Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;) Ahh - because "\once \override" applies not to the following text, but to the musical moment, right? Exactly. And the order of items within that moment doesn’t change their priority order.

Re: Outside staff priority

Hi Ralph, >> Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;) > Ahh - because "\once \override" applies not to the following text, but to the > musical moment, right? Exactly. And the order of items within that moment doesn’t change their priority order. > Perfect!

Re: Outside staff priority

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:22 AM Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > I don't understand why the following four examples all produce the same > output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* TextScripts? > > Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing.

Re: Outside staff priority

Hi Ralph, > I don't understand why the following four examples all produce the same > output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* TextScripts? Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;) > I'm trying to get the trill below the upbow. How about f'4( -\tweak

Outside staff priority

Greetings - I feel kind of stupid. I don't understand why the following four examples all produce the same output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* TextScripts? I'm trying to get the trill below the upbow. I'm using LilyPond 2.19.83 with Frescobaldi 3.0.0 under Linux/Ubuntu 18.04

Re: Outside-staff-priority and vertical order of grobs

grob and preserve at >> > the same time the vertical order set with outside-staff-priority? >> >> Provoke collision by setting staff-padding of TupletBracket to the >> same value and let LilyPond sort it. >> > > Hello Thomas, > > This method, unfor

Re: Outside-staff-priority and vertical order of grobs

On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 5:38 PM Thomas Morley wrote: > Am Mo., 9. Dez. 2019 um 17:05 Uhr schrieb Paolo Pr : > > > > > Is there a way to set the staff-padding property of a grob and preserve > at the same time the vertical order set with outside-staff-priority? > > P

Re: Outside-staff-priority and vertical order of grobs

Am Mo., 9. Dez. 2019 um 17:05 Uhr schrieb Paolo Pr : > > Hello, > > in the following snippet, I assigned to the TupletBracket grob an > outside-staff-priority higher than the OttavaBracket. Then, the OttavaBracket > is placed below it, as expected. > >

Outside-staff-priority and vertical order of grobs

Hello, in the following snippet, I assigned to the TupletBracket grob an outside-staff-priority higher than the OttavaBracket. Then, the OttavaBracket is placed below it, as expected. { \override TupletBracket.outside-staff-priority = #340 \override Staff.OttavaBracket.outside-staff

Re: Not understanding outside-staff-priority

> > I'm trying to place a RehearsalMark under a MetronomeMark and from the > > Notation Manual derived I should set the outside-staff-priority property > > for that. > > Playing with it resulted in the six examples below. Only the 5. shows the > &

Re: Not understanding outside-staff-priority

> > Could someone please shed some light as to why lilypond behaves the way it > > does? > > > > The default context for both Mark_engraver and Metronome_mark_engraver > is Score. Your overrides are ineffective because you omit 'Score.' Aaahh. Thank you Robin for this explanation. Kind

Re: Not understanding outside-staff-priority

Michael Gerdau wrote: Could someone please shed some light as to why lilypond behaves the way it does? The default context for both Mark_engraver and Metronome_mark_engraver is Score. Your overrides are ineffective because you omit 'Score.' Cheers, Robin

Re: Not understanding outside-staff-priority

Hi Michael, > I'm trying to place a RehearsalMark under a MetronomeMark and from the > Notation Manual derived I should set the outside-staff-priority property for > that. > Playing with it resulted in the six examples below. Only the 5. shows the > RehearsalMa

Not understanding outside-staff-priority

Hi list, I'm trying to place a RehearsalMark under a MetronomeMark and from the Notation Manual derived I should set the outside-staff-priority property for that. Playing with it resulted in the six examples below. Only the 5. shows the RehearsalMark where I want it to be. Why don't the other

RE: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority

Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote > FoxFanFare, > > Why not place the slut above the notes? > To me that would be more conventional. > > Mark Actually, the exemple above was just for demonstration. The problem is in another context: pedal.JPG

Re: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority

"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes: >> Mark Stephen Mrotek >> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2018 7:45 AM >> To: 'foxfanfare' ; lilypond-user@gnu.org >> Subject: RE: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority >> >> FoxFanFare, >> >> Why not p

RE: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority

: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority Hi all, Could someone please tell me what's wrong in my code? \version "2.19.81" \new Staff \relative c' { \override Staff.SustainPedal.outside-staff-priority = #5 \shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . -5)(0 . -5)(0 . 0))

RE: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority

Subject: SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority Hi all, Could someone please tell me what's wrong in my code? \version "2.19.81" \new Staff \relative c' { \override Staff.SustainPedal.outside-staff-priority = #5 \shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . -5)(0 . -5)(0 . 0))Slur c_( d e f g\sustain

SustainPedal and outside-staff-priority

Hi all, Could someone please tell me what's wrong in my code? \version "2.19.81" \new Staff \relative c' { \override Staff.SustainPedal.outside-staff-priority = #5 \shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . -5)(0 . -5)(0 . 0))Slur c_( d e f g\sustainOn a b c d e f g)\sustainOff } pedal1.JPG

Re: outside-staff-priority?

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Stephen MacNeil wrote: > \override Score.MetronomeMark.padding = #5 > > \tempo "Mod. fast Bulgar" 4 = 110-115 > My thanks to both Stephen and to Malte Meyn. Yes, I missed "Score". I was using Staff. "outside.staff.priority" would imply

Re: outside-staff-priority?

On 23.11.2015 23:05, Ralph Palmer wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Stephen MacNeil > wrote: \override Score.MetronomeMark.padding = #5 \tempo "Mod. fast Bulgar" 4 = 110-115 My thanks to both Stephen and to Malte

Re: outside-staff-priority?

Ralph Palmer writes: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Stephen MacNeil > wrote: > >> \override Score.MetronomeMark.padding = #5 >> >> \tempo "Mod. fast Bulgar" 4 = 110-115 >> > > My thanks to both Stephen and to Malte Meyn. Yes, I missed

outside-staff-priority?

setting the outside-staff-priority of each and/or both, but without success. I'm also not sure if MetronomeMark is the correct designation for the \tempo indication. Thanks in advance for any assistance, Ralph %%% begin snippet \version "2.19.31" \include "en

Re: outside-staff-priority?

Am 23.11.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Ralph Palmer: I tried setting the outside-staff-priority of each and/or both, but without success. \override Score.MetronomeMark.outside-staff-priority = 1501 % or \override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = 999 You probably missed the “Score

Ottava bracket outside-staff-priority

I want to put an ottava bracket inside a tuplet bracket. Using the outside-staff-priority parameter, this will only work if the tuplet bracket priority is greater than 400, which is the default for the ottava bracket. I thought that it was a matter of numerical ordering to do this, not absolute

Re: Ottava bracket outside-staff-priority

Il giorno sab 10 ott 2015 alle 11:58, Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> ha scritto: I want to put an ottava bracket inside a tuplet bracket. Using the outside-staff-priority parameter, this will only work if the tuplet bracket priority is greater than 400, which is the d

Re: Ottava bracket outside-staff-priority

gnores changes to its >> outside-staff-priority > > It’s probably simple as that: Ottava_spanner_engraver lives in Staff, so you > need to \override Staff.OttavaBracket. > > Yours, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.

Re: Ottava bracket outside-staff-priority

I thought you can do this sort of thing with an ordering: 2< 3. But I have to use 401 > 400, where 400 is the setting for the ottava bracket. I don’t have to do this for other sorts of objects. It is as though the ottava bracket ignores changes to its outside-staff-priority, unless I a

Re: Ottava bracket outside-staff-priority

On 10.10.2015 13:04, Andrew Bernard wrote: It is as though the ottava bracket ignores changes to its outside-staff-priority It’s probably simple as that: Ottava_spanner_engraver lives in Staff, so you need to \override Staff.OttavaBracket. Yours, Simon

outside-staff-priority for markups attached to

When I generate text to appear above some music using the ^\markup mytext syntax, I don't seem to be able to control the outside-staff-priority. In this example despite the second bit of markup having a lower outside-staff-priority it appears above the first bit. \version 2.18.0 \score

Re: outside-staff-priority for markups attached to

At 17:26 on 26 Jun 2014, Richard Shann wrote: When I generate text to appear above some music using the ^\markup mytext syntax, I don't seem to be able to control the outside-staff-priority. In this example despite the second bit of markup having a lower outside-staff-priority it appears above

Re: outside-staff-priority for markups attached to

-priority. In this example despite the second bit of markup having a lower outside-staff-priority it appears above the first bit. \version 2.18.0 \score { { \once \override TextScript.outside-staff-priority = #1000 ^\markup Above the next text please \once \override TextScript.outside

Why does TextScript outside-staff-priority not work in this case?

Hello, I am wanting to shift some \markups nearer to the staff and cannot understand why setting the outside-staff-priority of TextScript is not working in this case. --- \version 2.13.51 \relative c'' { R1*2 \override TextScript #'outside-staff-priority = ##f a'1~- ^\markup \right

Re: Why does TextScript outside-staff-priority not work in this case?

://old.nabble.com/Why-does-TextScript-outside-staff-priority-not-work-in-this-case--tp31079954p31080638.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

outside-staff-priority fails for TextSpanner with BarNumber

In the following example I cannot get the bar number below the text spanner. I tried to change the outside-staff-priority but this does not work. Regards, Frédéric \version 2.12.2 \relative c' { \override TextSpanner #'outside-staff-priority = #350 \override BarNumber #'outside

Re: outside-staff-priority fails for TextSpanner with BarNumber

Read the Learning Manual (section 4.4.3 explains how to do this) or search the archives. Trevor - Original Message - From: Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.org To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 6:51 AM Subject: outside-staff-priority fails

Re: outside-staff-priority fails for TextSpanner with BarNumber

Frédéric Bron wrote: In the following example I cannot get the bar number below the text spanner. I tried to change the outside-staff-priority but this does not work. Regards, that's weird - but in 2.13.16 it works as expected! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com

Re: outside-staff-priority fails for TextSpanner with BarNumber

Bar_number_engraver \override TextSpanner #'outside-staff-priority = #350 \override BarNumber #'outside-staff-priority = #50 } } \relative c' { \textSpannerUp \override TextSpanner #'(bound-details left text) = Stringendo c4\startTextSpan \repeat

Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

. I wanted to know why I can't just set Hairpin to #1 and the Slur to #2 for 'outside-staff-priority. And I forgot to search the LM before posting. Yes, I've read (but not memorized) the LM, and I see that overriding the 'outside-staff-priority for DynamicLineSpanner works while using the same

Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

--- On Fri, 9/18/09, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk Subject: Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: Friday, September 18, 2009, 10:22 AM Jonathan Wilkes

Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

Jonathan Wilkes wrote Friday, September 18, 2009 7:12 PM --- On Fri, 9/18/09, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: The difficulty is that there is no general rule that can be used to discover which properties have an effect on a particular grob and which do not. In this case one has

Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

Jonathan Wilkes wrote Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:38 AM I did a quick exercise typsetting a Schumann score, and I'm puzzled because to get the hairpin under the slur I had to turn up 'outside-staff-priority for the slur to be greater than 250. Otherwise, the snippet below doesn't

Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

--- On Thu, 9/17/09, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk Subject: Re: outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 10:08 AM Jonathan Wilkes

outside-staff-priority with slur and hairpin

Hello, I did a quick exercise typsetting a Schumann score, and I'm puzzled because to get the hairpin under the slur I had to turn up 'outside-staff-priority for the slur to be greater than 250. Otherwise, the snippet below doesn't work correctly. Reading the NR, it sounds like

outside-staff-priority with \mark and Markup

Hello everybody. In this example, outside-staff-priority seems to not work. What am i doing wrong ? \version 2.11.63 { \override RehearsalMark #'outside-staff-priority = #100 \override TextScript #'outside-staff-priority = #200 b1 b \bar || \mark Allegro con moto b^(clar

Re: outside-staff-priority with \mark and Markup

Gilles There is quite an extensive section on 'outside-staff-priority in the 2.11 Learning Manual which explains why this doesn't work and what needs to be done to fix it. See LM 4.4.3. Trevor - Original Message - From: Gilles THIBAULT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lilypond-user@gnu.org

outside-staff-priority

#'outside-staff-priority = #1 \override MultiMeasureRestText #'outside-staff-priority = #5 \mark \default R1*2^\markup{some text} \mark \default R1 } } \paper { ragged-right = ##t } ___ lilypond-user

Re: outside-staff-priority

Hi David, I would also like to know if it is still possible to widen the MultiMeasureRest. I know this used to be possible with minimumMeasureWidth or something. Haven't found a reference to anything like that in the current docs. \override MultiMeasureRest #'minimum-length = #15

Re: outside-staff-priority

On 12/03/2008, David Bobroff wrote: The following short example exhibits a problem I've not been able to solve. The rehearsal marks are placed further from the staff than the MultiMeasureRestText. I want to keep the rehearsal marks close to the staff and have the text further away. Well

Re: outside-staff-priority

Risto Vääräniemi wrote: The manual doesn't mention lyrics, though. Sometimes I'd like to move a hairpin or similar above the lyrics. How do I do that? One solution is to use the Dynamics context defined in the template called Piano centered dynamics. /Mats