Hi Karlin,
Thanks for your response.
> I use the part combiner in every project I do.
That's great to hear.
> As far as helping with such a project, my experience with LilyPond
> amounts to only a year or so.
Every little bit helps.
> I know nothing at all about Scheme-family languages,
>
Hi David,
> Nevertheless I am really at a loss of what "working with
> you towards a really great partcombiner" is supposed to mean.
I'm sorry you're at a loss. Hopefully things will become clearer to you as time
goes on.
> What is the kind of work you are envisioning for yourself here?
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> 3. I have always been, and continue to be, happy to sponsor
> infrastructure improvements. That being said: (a) I am in no financial
> position to offer a monthly amount of any significance; and (b) nobody
> has ever asked me to sponsor
showing how partcombine and quote don't play
well together. This limitation is interfering with my ability to put together
the Awesome Divisi Choral Framework™ I'm currently working on.
In <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-08/msg00215.html>,
Malte offered a solution which
On 6/6/2017 11:30 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> 2. Am I the only one who wants a killer part-combining framework? Is nobody
> else using it as much as I am (even in its highly-limited current state)?
>
> 3. Are there any programmers out there willing to work with me towards a
> really great
Hi David,
> I'd put in my usual rant about the ungrateful and underpaid work to
> improve infrastructure until user-accessible features become low-hanging
> fruit and can be implemented for a smile and a song, but it is a bit
> pointless since there aren't smiles and songs for those either.
1. I
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>>> Not sure if this was "I hit send early", or "teaching a man to
>> fish", or "+1"…?
>> It was "the principles of the mechanisms are incompatible".
>
> I thought that might be it…
>
> Coincidentally, I've long wanted to help
Hi David,
>> Not sure if this was "I hit send early", or "teaching a man to fish", or
>> "+1"…?
> It was "the principles of the mechanisms are incompatible".
I thought that might be it…
Coincidentally, I've long wanted to help spearhead and sponsor a "Grand Unified
Partcombine Project".
Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes:
> Hi David,
>
>>> The snippet below contains a [M]WE showing how partcombine and quote
>>> don't play well together.
>>
>> Quotes pick up one (bottom) context, partcombine produces several.
Hi David,
>> The snippet below contains a [M]WE showing how partcombine and quote
>> don't play well together.
>
> Quotes pick up one (bottom) context, partcombine produces several.
Not sure if this was "I hit send early", or "teaching a man to
Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> The snippet below contains a [M]WE showing how partcombine and quote
> don't play well together.
Quotes pick up one (bottom) context, partcombine produces several.
Hello all,
The snippet below contains a [M]WE showing how partcombine and quote don't play
well together. This limitation is interfering with my ability to put together
the Awesome Divisi Choral Framework™ I'm currently working on.
In <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016
12 matches
Mail list logo