Brilliant!
JM
> Le 26 nov. 2016 à 17:52, David Kastrup a écrit :
>
> David Sumbler writes:
>
>> Thanks for these 2 replies. I have tidied things up a bit by using
>>
>> \once \omit Accidental
>>
>> as suggested by Noeck.
>>
>> David's reply has given me several things to look up and think
David Kastrup writes:
> David Sumbler writes:
>
>> Thanks for these 2 replies. I have tidied things up a bit by using
>>
>> \once \omit Accidental
>>
>> as suggested by Noeck.
>>
>> David's reply has given me several things to look up and think about
>> (which is good!). The quoted "@", \singl
David Sumbler writes:
> Thanks for these 2 replies. I have tidied things up a bit by using
>
> \once \omit Accidental
>
> as suggested by Noeck.
>
> David's reply has given me several things to look up and think about
> (which is good!). The quoted "@", \single and \etc were all
> effectively n
Thanks for these 2 replies. I have tidied things up a bit by using
\once \omit Accidental
as suggested by Noeck.
David's reply has given me several things to look up and think about
(which is good!). The quoted "@", \single and \etc were all
effectively new to me - although I must have read ab
Noeck writes:
> Hi David,
>
> yes, I think there is no such command as short as ?.
>
>> Using '\once \override Accidental.stencil = ##f' isn't too onerous -
>> but I just wondered if there was an even easier way.
>
> \once \omit Accidental
> is the same and it is a bit shorter but no way near ! o
Hi David,
yes, I think there is no such command as short as ?.
> Using '\once \override Accidental.stencil = ##f' isn't too onerous -
> but I just wondered if there was an even easier way.
\once \omit Accidental
is the same and it is a bit shorter but no way near ! or ?.
Of course, you can alway
In Lilypond we have '!' to force an accidental to appear and '?' to
produce a cautionary accidental.
Is there any similarly simple way to prevent an accidental being
printed where it otherwise would be?
Using '\once \override Accidental.stencil = ##f' isn't too onerous -
but I just wondered if th
Dear lilypond list,
Can i ask lilypond to put an accidental before every non-repeated note (as
common practise in dodecaphonic scores) without having to put an !
everywhere behind the pitch name?
Thanks, Arno
--
http://www.arnowaschk.de
___
lilypond-user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >
> > > It really wouldn't be that difficult to make a setting to
> >
> > it depends. It would be quite hairy to get transposition right, for
> > example.
>
> Not if the operation of making the signature chromatics is done *first*.
> [..snippage..]
>
> I'm sure I coul
On Sunday 14 September 2003 07:15 am, Rune Zedeler wrote:
> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > It really wouldn't be that difficult to make a setting to
> > make-key-signature-chromatics true which would do what it
> > says and leave notes which have accidentals alone.
>
> Yes it would.
> This way the
On Sunday 14 September 2003 06:30 am, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Indeed, and it suggests that the documentation should make this
> > > point more clearly. I made the same mistake when I started out.
> >
> > It really wouldn't be that difficult to make a setting to
>
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
It really wouldn't be that difficult to make a setting to
make-key-signature-chromatics true which would do what it
says and leave notes which have accidentals alone.
Yes it would.
This way the music definitions would be context dependent, meaning that
the same piece o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Indeed, and it suggests that the documentation should make this point
> > more clearly. I made the same mistake when I started out.
>
> It really wouldn't be that difficult to make a setting to
it depends. It would be quite hairy to get transposition right, for
exam
On Saturday 13 September 2003 08:08 pm, Nathan Hurst wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:08:52 -0700
>
> Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rune Zedeler wrote:
> > > We see this question very often on this list - and I REALLY don't
> > > understand why... :-(
> >
> > Apparently this is not relat
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:08:34 +1000
Nathan Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:08:52 -0700
> Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Apparently this is not related to the OP's question but I don't see
> > why you don't understand. It's because that's the way Finale and
> > o
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:08:52 -0700
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rune Zedeler wrote:
>
> > We see this question very often on this list - and I REALLY don't
> > understand why... :-(
>
> Apparently this is not related to the OP's question but I don't see
> why you don't understand.
Rune Zedeler wrote:
We see this question very often on this list - and I REALLY don't
understand why... :-(
Apparently this is not related to the OP's question but I don't see why
you don't understand. It's because that's the way Finale and other
software works. If you've used other software
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> As I'm coming to understand it, if you are in "\key F \major",
> "bes" will give you a no-accidental B
> "b" will give you a b with a natural accidental
>
> Yeah?
>
a "no-accidental B" does not exist, strictly speaking:
* Note heads on the staff have or ha
You don't understand: in the file.ly the notes must be entered exactly as if there was no
\key entry. So if you want "f" sharp just type "fis". If it is "f" natural just "f".
Then lily combines \key and the pitches to decide if it is necessary to print the symbol
sharp before the f. So if you use
On Samedi, sep 13, 2003, at 12:22 America/New_York, Rune Zedeler wrote:
Lucas Gonze wrote:
Given the following score, the 2nd note should come out in the DVI as
an F sharp, but is instead an F natural. Any suggestions? Have
mercy -- I am still struggling through the "hello world" stage.
\score
Lucas Gonze wrote:
Given the following score, the 2nd note should come out in the DVI as an
F sharp, but is instead an F natural. Any suggestions? Have mercy -- I
am still struggling through the "hello world" stage.
\score {
\notes {
\clef treble
\time
Given the following score, the 2nd note should come out in the DVI as
an F sharp, but is instead an F natural. Any suggestions? Have mercy
-- I am still struggling through the "hello world" stage.
\score {
\notes {
\clef treble
\time 3/8
\key g
22 matches
Mail list logo
