Hi,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > e.g. if I assume x means 'the last notes', I could write the above
> > as,
> >
> >8 x16 x x4 x16 x8 x16
>
> Actually, I like an `x' even more than `<>'.
>
> I can't see an immediate problem from the syntax
Thanks to all for anwering so quickly!
I don't know Scheme, but Looking at files like italiano.ly, I see that
it supports macros:
---
pitchnamesItaliano = #`(
(dobb . ,(ly:make-pitch -1 0 DOUBLE-FLAT))
(dobsb . ,(ly:make-pitch -1 0 THREE-Q-FLAT))
(dob . ,
> e.g. if I assume x means 'the last notes', I could write the above
> as,
>
>8 x16 x x4 x16 x8 x16
Actually, I like an `x' even more than `<>'.
I can't see an immediate problem from the syntax side. Whether it's
easy to implement I don't know. Han-Wen?
Werner
_
Graham Percival wrote:
> No; we understand it quite well.
>From what I could see, Mats' example did not implement what was requested.
> Adding something like this to the basic syntax could be quite
> problematic. We already get enough complaints about changing the
> syntax, so we certainly shoul
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:50:20 +0100
Joseph Wakeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you still don't understand what is being requested.
No; we understand it quite well.
Adding something like this to the basic syntax could be quite
problematic. We already get enough complaints about changing
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> If you find the \repeat unfold syntax too long to type in, you can easily
> defined a macro with a shorter name:
> rr = #(define-music-function (parser location num music)(number? ly:music?)
> #{ \repeat unfold $num $music #})
I think you still don't understand what is bein
Dear Eric,
I think I have the same problem as You. Typing a lot of chords is a lot of
work. But I use the lilypond-tool and jedit for help. There You can make
shortcuts or You can expand abbreviations. For example, if I have a chord
like
I type only cv, than I press the space bar, and than I get t
\repeat is nice for true repetitions, but if I have various patterns using the
same chord with different durations, and some ties or accents or different
beaming or slurs, it does not work. Only the notes (pitches) really are
repeated.
random example: c8 Y Y Y->~ | Y( Z) Z4_. | c8 X-> X_. X16 e
If you find the \repeat unfold syntax too long to type in, you can easily
defined a macro with a shorter name:
rr = #(define-music-function (parser location num music)(number? ly:music?)
#{ \repeat unfold $num $music #})
The only complication is that you have to add a #-mark before the
number tha
> In fact I see no reason for it to be limited to chords: some
> notation for 'same note(s) again' would be very desirable.
Yes, the stress lies on `same' -- it's easy to accidentally type, say
e e e c e e e
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing l
> > I don't think so. Rather a shortcut to avoid zillions of copy and
> > paste operations. Additionally, you get shorter lines, and the
> > suggested syntax is much easier to understand than using \repeat
> > or something like that.
>
> Should it then only apply only to chords or also to single
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> You mean like
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Measure-repeats#Measure-repeats
I interpret the suggestion to mean that he wants the _notes_ to appear
(unlike the link you posted, which uses 'slash' notation to indicate
repetition), but wants some
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
You mean like
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Measure-repeats#Measure-repeats
I don't think so. Rather a shortcut to avoid zillions of copy and
paste operations. Additionally, you get shorter lines, and the
suggested syntax is much easier
> You mean like
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Measure-repeats#Measure-repeats
I don't think so. Rather a shortcut to avoid zillions of copy and
paste operations. Additionally, you get shorter lines, and the
suggested syntax is much easier to understand than using \
You mean like
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Measure-repeats#Measure-repeats
/Mats
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a shortcut for writing repeated chords? For example instead of
16
16 8 16
etc...
I would like a token meaning "the last chord (pitches between <
> Is there a shortcut for writing repeated chords? For example instead
> of
>
> 16
> 16 8 16
> etc...
>
> I would like a token meaning "the last chord (pitches between < and
> >) once again".
>
> If there is nothing, does the suggestion to use empty chords <> for
> this seem interesting? (pr
16 matches
Mail list logo
