Re: list of thicknesses affected by changing StaffSymbol.thickness

2016-02-08 Thread Paul Morris
> On Jan 31, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > I do think that it should be easier to override staff line thickness in a > style sheet without changing other line thicknesses. This would indeed be a good thing. In the meantime, this snippet shows a possible

Re: list of thicknesses affected by changing StaffSymbol.thickness

2016-02-08 Thread Paul Morris
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Paul Morris wrote: > > To make things easier, I can imagine a user function that returns a list of > line positions based on a thickness argument (and maybe optionally a line > pattern list). So for a staff with a single line at position

Re: list of thicknesses affected by changing StaffSymbol.thickness

2016-01-31 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 31.01.2016 22:34, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Ultimately, my goal is to be able to design stylesheets that match certain “house styles” (e.g., Hanle, Chappell & Co., Peters). I find that many plate-engraved scores appear to have a slightly heavier overall look to the staff lines, so I wanted

Re: list of thicknesses affected by changing StaffSymbol.thickness

2016-01-31 Thread Noeck
Hi, Am 31.01.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: > Apparently, StaffSymbol.thickness affects spanners (not all of them) > proportionally: > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/spanners > but also ledger lines, stem thickness, beam length fraction, beam >

Re: list of thicknesses affected by changing StaffSymbol.thickness

2016-01-31 Thread Thomas Morley
2016-01-31 17:31 GMT+01:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider : > Hi Kieren, > > I've never seen such list but it would be helpful. > Apparently, StaffSymbol.thickness affects spanners (not all of them) > proportionally: >

Re: list of thicknesses affected by changing StaffSymbol.thickness

2016-01-31 Thread Thomas Morley
2016-01-31 21:26 GMT+01:00 Noeck : > Hi, > > Am 31.01.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: >> Apparently, StaffSymbol.thickness affects spanners (not all of them) >> proportionally: >> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/spanners >> but also

Re: list of thicknesses affected by changing StaffSymbol.thickness

2016-01-31 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Harm, This is very helpful in one sense — thank you! Ultimately, my goal is to be able to design stylesheets that match certain “house styles” (e.g., Hanle, Chappell & Co., Peters). I find that many plate-engraved scores appear to have a slightly heavier overall look to the staff lines, so

Re: list of thicknesses affected by changing StaffSymbol.thickness

2016-01-31 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi Kieren, I've never seen such list but it would be helpful. Apparently, StaffSymbol.thickness affects spanners (not all of them) proportionally: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/spanners but also ledger lines, stem thickness, beam length fraction, beam attachment...

re: list of thicknesses affected by changing StaffSymbol.thickness

2016-01-31 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hello all, I was just checking to see if anyone has an answer to my post of Jan 7: > Is there a single list somewhere in the documentation, of all the grobs whose > sizes are tied to StaffSymbol.thickness? > (Optimally, that list would also include each grob’s default > multiplier/thickness.)