on 2009-09-30 at 10:12 Carl Sorensen wrote:
>There's actually another case that can lead to failure. That is when
>the 16th notes come in the 2nd or 4th beat of the measure,
yes, i see. i think this has been reported by valentin more than a year
ago here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/iss
On 9/29/09 7:25 PM, "luis jure" wrote:
>
>
> thank you carl for your answer. i still think that 2.13.4 has some
> beaming issues.
>
>
>> We've had a serious discussion about whether eighth note beams should
>> end on every beat or only on beats 2 and 4.
>>
>> We came down on the side of e
on 2009-09-29 at 22:25 luis jure wrote:
>now, 2.13.4 correctly beams every quarter note when 16th notes are
>present, **except in one case:** a 16th rest followed by a dotted 8th
>(see second bar in the attached image).
<>___
lilypond-user mailing lis
thank you carl for your answer. i still think that 2.13.4 has some
beaming issues.
>We've had a serious discussion about whether eighth note beams should
>end on every beat or only on beats 2 and 4.
>
>We came down on the side of ending eighth note beams on 2 and 4,
>because it seemed to fit Sto
On 9/27/09 10:23 AM, "luis jure" wrote:
>
>
> on 2009-09-27 at 08:02 Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>> The autobeaming behavior (and the documentation) have been fixed in
>> 2.13.4.
>
> i find a regression in 2.13.4 with respect to 2.13.3.
>
> i recently updated to 2.13.3 and i was very happy to
on 2009-09-27 at 08:02 Carl Sorensen wrote:
>The autobeaming behavior (and the documentation) have been fixed in
>2.13.4.
i find a regression in 2.13.4 with respect to 2.13.3.
i recently updated to 2.13.3 and i was very happy to see that the
automatic placing of beams had improved greatly compa
