On 9/25/09 5:36 PM, "fiëé visuëlle" wrote:
> Am 2009-09-25 um 22:54 schrieb James E. Bailey:
>>> Just, pretty please: Could someone tell me how to get chord names
>>> with -is and -es (saying "fis" and not "f#")?
>>> Or of course point me to the appropriate chapter of the docs.
>>
>> Section
Am 2009-09-25 um 22:54 schrieb James E. Bailey:
Just, pretty please: Could someone tell me how to get chord names
with -is and -es (saying "fis" and not "f#")?
Or of course point me to the appropriate chapter of the docs.
Section 2.7.2, Displaying chords under Customizing chord names
Of co
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:36:21PM +0100, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>> For the record, does he also want you to use the old Novello
>> "backwards eighth-note rest" for quarter rests?
>> I mean, that was also the "common practice since Bach" — but people
>> [wisely] decided that a *real* quarte
On 9/25/09 2:17 PM, "fiëé visuëlle" wrote:
>
> Just, pretty please: Could someone tell me how to get chord names with
> -is and -es (saying "fis" and not "f#")?
> Or of course point me to the appropriate chapter of the docs.
Here's a set of scheme routines that will allow you to get Fis, Aes
On 25.09.2009, at 22:17, fiëé visuëlle wrote:
Just, pretty please: Could someone tell me how to get chord names
with -is and -es (saying "fis" and not "f#")?
Or of course point me to the appropriate chapter of the docs.
Section 2.7.2, Displaying chords under Customizing chord names
James E.
Am 2009-09-25 um 21:03 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
The reason why I didn't just use [] instead of () is that I didn't
want to check and change the lyrics of all the songs that were
already
typeset. I guess I'll use that approach for the rest of the songbook.
But the documentation says that if au
On 9/25/09 10:15 AM, "fiëé visuëlle" wrote:
>
> The reason why I didn't just use [] instead of () is that I didn't
> want to check and change the lyrics of all the songs that were already
> typeset. I guess I'll use that approach for the rest of the songbook.
>
But the documentation says th
In message , Kieren
MacMillan writes
Hi,
Sorry, no chance - "this is common practice since Bach,
and I as a seasoned choir leader" yadda yadda...
Wow... a closed-minded, backwards-thinking choral director. There's a
first time for everything, I guess! ;)
He's very much convinced that hi
Thank you all for the discussion and the good advice!
I don't want to let my editor look like an evil stick-in-the-mud (or
how do you say) - he's a real expert in German and European folk
music, so maybe he's just only used to older songbooks... (And I
agree, most folk songbooks that are 10
On 9/25/09 9:44 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Freitag, 25. September 2009 17:41:00 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>> On 9/25/09 8:39 AM, "fiëé visuëlle" wrote:
>>> If I switched off slurs using
>>> \override Slur #'stencil = ##f
>>> how do I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 25. September 2009 17:41:00 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> On 9/25/09 8:39 AM, "fiëé visuëlle" wrote:
> > If I switched off slurs using
> > \override Slur #'stencil = ##f
> > how do I enable it again without warnings?
> >
> > \override Slur #'st
On 9/25/09 8:39 AM, "fiëé visuëlle" wrote:
>
> If I switched off slurs using
> \override Slur #'stencil = ##f
> how do I enable it again without warnings?
>
> \override Slur #'stencil = ##t
> does work, but issues an error (#t is no stencil)
If you read the Internals Reference, 3.1.90 Slur,
Hi,
Sorry, no chance - "this is common practice since Bach,
and I as a seasoned choir leader" yadda yadda...
Wow... a closed-minded, backwards-thinking choral director. There's a
first time for everything, I guess! ;)
He's very much convinced that his "standard" is much easier to read
Hi Reinhold,
here in Europe, that is traditional notation
Yes, it's "traditional notation" over here, too... ;)
From the Essential Dictionary of Music Notation, pg 186:
"Beaming of notes associated with a lyric now follows standard
notational practice. Traditional practice, now obsolete,
On 9/25/09 6:31 AM, "fiëé visuëlle" wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> my editor tells me, in vocal music eights (everything smaller than a
> quarter) have to be normally unbarred and I should use barred eights
> instead of slurs.
>
> Is there a global setting for that?
To change the global settings fo
I don't understand how \override Slur #'stencil = ##f can solve any
problems, since you have to insert the corresponding beams manually to
get the correct melisma. Why not use your text editor to replace each (
by a [ and each ) by a ] ? This, combined with \autoBeamOff, will give
the desired b
Am 2009-09-25 um 16:37 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
Am Freitag, 25. September 2009 16:21:01 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi,
my editor tells me, in vocal music eights (everything smaller than
a quarter)
have to be normally unbarred and I should use barred eights instead
of slurs.
That is *not*
Am 2009-09-25 um 16:21 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
my editor tells me, in vocal music eights (everything smaller than
a quarter)
have to be normally unbarred and I should use barred eights instead
of slurs.
That is *not* modern practice... I would *strongly* recommend that
you try to convin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 25. September 2009 16:21:01 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi,
>
> > my editor tells me, in vocal music eights (everything smaller than
> > a quarter)
> > have to be normally unbarred and I should use barred eights instead
> > of slurs.
>
>
Hi,
my editor tells me, in vocal music eights (everything smaller than
a quarter)
have to be normally unbarred and I should use barred eights instead
of slurs.
That is *not* modern practice... I would *strongly* recommend that
you try to convince your editor to use modern practice (i.e.,
Hi again,
my editor tells me, in vocal music eights (everything smaller than a
quarter) have to be normally unbarred and I should use barred eights
instead of slurs.
Is there a global setting for that?
I know \autoBeamOn/Off (works only within a voice) and \override Slur
#'stencil = ##f
21 matches
Mail list logo
