some missing items?

2004-10-25 Thread Kieren Richard MacMillan
[ Mac OS X 10.3.5 ; Lilypond 2.3.20 via Fink ] Hey, y'all! Just curious -- is it just me, or is Lilypond missing rf (as opposed to rfz) and the articulation mark for a natural harmonic (o)? Couldn't find them anywhere in the docs... Cheers, Kieren.

Re: some missing items?

2004-10-25 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote: [ Mac OS X 10.3.5 ; Lilypond 2.3.20 via Fink ] Hey, y'all! Just curious -- is it just me, or is Lilypond missing rf (as opposed to rfz) Yes, and I'm sure that you can find many other similar indications that are not included. However, you can easily add your own

Re: some missing items?

2004-10-25 Thread Kieren Richard MacMillan
Hi, Mats: you can easily add your own favourite dynamic indications using rf = #(make-dynamic-script rf) Awesome -- thanks! How about the \flageolet listed among all other articulations in the manual? Is that really considered the accepted harmonic articulation? I saw it, but it didn't look

Re: some missing items?

2004-10-25 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Monday 25 October 2004 07:32 am, Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote: [ Mac OS X 10.3.5 ; Lilypond 2.3.20 via Fink ] Hey, y'all! Just curious -- is it just me, or is Lilypond missing rf (as opposed to rfz) and the articulation mark for a natural harmonic (o)? That's called a flagolet.

Re: some missing items?

2004-10-25 Thread Graham Percival
On 25-Oct-04, at 4:49 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote: and the articulation mark for a natural harmonic (o)? Couldn't find them anywhere in the docs... How about the \flageolet listed among all other articulations in the manual? The articulation for a natural harmonic is