[ Mac OS X 10.3.5 ; Lilypond 2.3.20 via Fink ]
Hey, y'all!
Just curious -- is it just me, or is Lilypond missing rf (as opposed to
rfz) and the articulation mark for a natural harmonic (o)? Couldn't
find them anywhere in the docs...
Cheers,
Kieren.
Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
[ Mac OS X 10.3.5 ; Lilypond 2.3.20 via Fink ]
Hey, y'all!
Just curious -- is it just me, or is Lilypond missing rf (as opposed to
rfz)
Yes, and I'm sure that you can find many other similar indications that
are not included. However, you can easily add your own
Hi, Mats:
you can easily add your own favourite dynamic indications using
rf = #(make-dynamic-script rf)
Awesome -- thanks!
How about the \flageolet listed among all other articulations in the
manual?
Is that really considered the accepted harmonic articulation? I saw it,
but it didn't look
On Monday 25 October 2004 07:32 am, Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
[ Mac OS X 10.3.5 ; Lilypond 2.3.20 via Fink ]
Hey, y'all!
Just curious -- is it just me, or is Lilypond missing rf (as opposed
to
rfz) and the articulation mark for a natural harmonic (o)?
That's called a flagolet.
On 25-Oct-04, at 4:49 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
and the articulation mark for a natural harmonic (o)? Couldn't
find them anywhere in the docs...
How about the \flageolet listed among all other articulations in the
manual?
The articulation for a natural harmonic is