Have a look at these two snippets.
% slur.ly
\relative c'
<<
{ c'8( b) } \\
{ e,4 }
>>
% slur-beam.ly
\relative c'
<<
{ c'8[( b]) } \\
{ e,4 }
>>
% staccato-slur.ly
\relative c'
<<
{ c'8( b-.) } \\
{ e,4 }
>>
% staccato-slur-beam.
Hi Werner,
This lovely collection of snippets reveals oh so many problems… :)
1. The staccato dot should be directly at the end of the stem (see Gould,
etc.), unless it’s part of a compound/multiple articulation.
2. Yes, the slur should behave as if there’s a beam present.
3. Yes, the slur sh
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Werner,
>
> This lovely collection of snippets reveals oh so many problems… :)
>
> 1. The staccato dot should be directly at the end of the stem (see Gould,
> etc.), unless it’s part of a compound/
Hi David,
> This situation with staccato dots is more complex, however. Gould says:
> "Staccato dots and wedges by themselves look best centred on a stem ...
> although many editions do centre them on the notehead" (118).
Good point.
Perhaps it could/should be a parameter?
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
Hi Kieren,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > This situation with staccato dots is more complex, however. Gould says:
> "Staccato dots and wedges by themselves look best centred on a stem ...
> although many editions do cen
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Hi Kieren,
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Kieren MacMillan <
> kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> > This situation with staccato dots is more complex, however. Gould
>> says: "Staccato dots and wedges by thems
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:50 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kieren,
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Kieren MacMillan <
>> kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> > This situation with staccato do
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:14 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> It's definitely possible! Using a pointer to a ScriptColumn, the X-offset
> callback for Script can be modified to (1) center staccatos over the stem if
> no other articulations are present; (2) center them over the note head if
> multiple
Hi Jay,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Jay Anderson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:14 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
> > It's definitely possible! Using a pointer to a ScriptColumn, the
> X-offset
> > callback for Script can be modified to (1) center staccatos over the
> stem if
> > no othe
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Jay Anderson
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:14 PM, David Nalesnik
>> wrote:
>> > It's definitely possible! Using a pointer to a ScriptColumn, the
>> X-offset
>> > callback for Script
>> That's effectively what I'm doing. I'm changing the X-offset
>> callback because it's only there that the property
>> toward-stem-shift is read (see scm/output-lib.scm). The trick is
>> allowing two different concurrent values for toward-stem-shift: 1.0
>> for when the staccato is alone, 0.0
Hi Werner,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> That's effectively what I'm doing. I'm changing the X-offset
> >> callback because it's only there that the property
> >> toward-stem-shift is read (see scm/output-lib.scm). The trick is
> >> allowing two different concu
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:33 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> I have something which is almost ready to be reviewed, but I need to get
> several patches pushed and into current master first.
>
>
A patch is up for review: see
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2535
--David
_
13 matches
Mail list logo
