Graham Percival writes:
> http://lilypond.org/bug-reports
> http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples
Why are these in plural; I would prefer: /bug-report, /tiny-example ?
Jan -- just asking for these in a private mail and mistyping the urls :-)
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lil
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:21:17AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > http://lilypond.org/bug-reports
>
> > http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples
>
> Why are these in plural; I would prefer: /bug-report, /tiny-example ?
Because I thought that the phrase "Tiny ex
I've had it marked on my calendar for days that May 17 is the scheduled
release date, " If no Critical bugs are found..." (Ly website).
The website in no way indicates that this occurred, nor are there any
announcements that I can find on this list.
Can someone provide a status update re: thi
According to this list:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list
it looks like critical issues were found. Not sure why nothing was
mentioned on the website.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
> I've had it marked on my calendar for days that May 17 is the scheduled
> relea
Neil Thornock writes:
>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
>>> I've had it marked on my calendar for days that May 17 is the scheduled
>>> release date, " If no Critical bugs are found..." (Ly website).
>>>
>>> The website in no way indicates that this occurred, nor are there any
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
> Can someone provide a status update re: this event, please?
Greetings,
there is a long-ish explanation about the release process in our
latest LilyPond Report:
http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-26#the_road_to_2_16
Cheers,
Valentin.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:02:01AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> there is a long-ish explanation about the release process in our
> latest LilyPond Report:
> http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-26#the_road_to_2_16
Can we get a news item for this? and maybe a (general) email to
the u
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:02:01PM +, Keith OHara wrote:
> A recent stable LilyPond version would also help. I converted the scores I
> was working on from 2.12 to 2.13, to avoid difficulties with \partcombine,
> but then 2.13 kept changing so I've abandoned the 2.13 versions and now have
> pr
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:34:05 -0700, Graham Percival
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:02:01PM +, Keith OHara wrote:
A recent stable LilyPond version would also help. I converted the scores I
was working on from 2.12 to 2.13, to avoid difficulties with \partcombine,
but then 2.13 kept cha
Hello,
I'm curious (and I'm using version 2.13), and I wondered if
\partcombine is supposed to work with more than two parts. The
documentation refers to combining "several" parts, but only shows
examples with two parts. I was unsuccessful trying to use more than
two parts (in my pathetic attempts
bruys . gmail.com> writes:
> I wondered if
> \partcombine is supposed to work with more than two parts. The
> documentation refers to combining "several" parts, but only shows
> examples with two parts.
\partcombine does not try to combine more than two parts.
> P.S. As an aside, the Scheme f
Dear Keith,
Thank you, your reply is appreciated.
It seems like there a bit of a hole in the documentation with respect to the
Scheme interface, but no doubt a difficult one to fill. Apart from knowing
what an S-expression is, and what cons means, I don't know much Scheme. One
day, I'll have to t
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock wrote:
> According to this list:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list
>
> it looks like critical issues were found.
Yes, they were.
> Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website.
I'm not happy with this practice, either.
On the o
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:05AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock wrote:
> > Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website.
>
> I'm not happy with this practice, either.
I eagerly await your patch. If it looks ok I'll tell you to push
directly t
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:05AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock
>> wrote:
>> > Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website.
>>
>> I'm not happy with this practice, either.
>
> I eager
15 matches
Mail list logo
