Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2018-09-13 4:42 am, David Kastrup wrote:
>> [...] If you write something like
>>
>> \stemDown \once \stemUp \stemNeutral
>>
>> what's the expectation for the current timestep, and what's the
>> expectation for afterwards?
>
> If \stem(Up|Down|Neutral) were as simple as "St
Aaron Hill writes:
> Token(s)Stem.direction (Stack)
>
> \stemDown Down ()
> \once \stemUp <{> Up (Down)
> \stemNeutral <...> (Down)
> <}> Down ()
>
> This behavior is iden
On 2018-09-13 4:42 am, David Kastrup wrote:
[...] If you write something like
\stemDown \once \stemUp \stemNeutral
what's the expectation for the current timestep, and what's the
expectation for afterwards?
If \stem(Up|Down|Neutral) were as simple as "Stem.direction :=
(Up|Down|Neutral)" and
Edward Neeman writes:
> Thanks David, that makes a lot of sense!
>
> With your explanation in mind I’m thinking the current implementation in best.
Well, the problem really is finding an implementation that does not
cause surprises. One could rather brutally restore all settings made
inside of
Thanks David, that makes a lot of sense!
With your explanation in mind I’m thinking the current implementation in best.
Edward
---
Dr. Edward Neeman
www.neemanpianoduo.com
> On 13 Sep 2018, at 9:42 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> David Kastrup mailto:d...@gnu.org>> writes:
>
>> Edward Neeman
David Kastrup writes:
> Edward Neeman writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I’ve come across some weird behaviour from the \stemNeutral command. This
>> doesn’t work:
>>
>>
>>
>> \version "2.19.82"
>>
>> \relative { \stemUp 8) r8
>> \acciaccatura { \stemDown 8 } \stemUp r
>> \stemNeutral c,
Edward Neeman writes:
> Hello,
>
> I’ve come across some weird behaviour from the \stemNeutral command. This
> doesn’t work:
>
>
>
> \version "2.19.82"
>
> \relative { \stemUp 8) r8
> \acciaccatura { \stemDown 8 } \stemUp r
> \stemNeutral c,16 es ges bes }
>
> %%%
>
> Adding a se
On 2018-09-12 10:30 pm, Federico Bruni wrote:
You are right, it seems weird.
If you check your property-init.ly file you'll find these definitions:
stemUp = \override Stem.direction = #UP
stemDown = \override Stem.direction = #DOWN
stemNeutral = \revert Stem.direction
But I don't know what's ha
You are right, it seems weird.
If you check your property-init.ly file you'll find these definitions:
stemUp = \override Stem.direction = #UP
stemDown = \override Stem.direction = #DOWN
stemNeutral = \revert Stem.direction
But I don't know what's happening here.
Il giorno gio 13 set 2018 alle 7
Thanks for the reply.
I still don’t understand why two \stemNeutral commands work differently to just
one. Take out one of them in this example and it looks different:
%%%
\version "2.19.82"
\relative {
g' % default is \stemUp
\stemUp 8 r8
\acciaccatura { \stemDown 8 } \stemUp r
% \stemNeutra
Il giorno gio 13 set 2018 alle 5:08, Edward Neeman
ha scritto:
Hello,
I’ve come across some weird behaviour from the \stemNeutral
command. This doesn’t work:
\version "2.19.82"
\relative { \stemUp 8) r8
\acciaccatura { \stemDown 8 } \stemUp r
\stemNeutral c,16 es ges be
Hello,
I’ve come across some weird behaviour from the \stemNeutral command. This
doesn’t work:
\version "2.19.82"
\relative { \stemUp 8) r8
\acciaccatura { \stemDown 8 } \stemUp r
\stemNeutral c,16 es ges bes }
%%%
Adding a second \stemNeutral command is necessary to reset th
12 matches
Mail list logo
