Re: switch to lilypond from finale

2005-12-09 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Thursday 08 December 2005 14.47, Pedro Kröger wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > One problem is that Lily will usually process the entire piece, which > > makes entering large pieces time consuming. > > but it needn't to be. One can use variables to hold sections of music

Re: switch to lilypond from finale

2005-12-08 Thread Pedro Kröger
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One problem is that Lily will usually process the entire piece, which > makes entering large pieces time consuming. but it needn't to be. One can use variables to hold sections of music and compile just the section been entered. I have written some

Re: switch to lilypond from finale

2005-12-08 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Josué wrote: Hi list, i use to work as engraver for publishers companys. I work with finale2004 under MacOSX, im really impressed by this new software, but ive got a few questions: - How much quick can be this program? I use to work with really big scores for large orchestra. Hi, of cours

Re: switch to lilypond from finale

2005-12-07 Thread D Josiah Boothby
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Josu wrote: Hi list, i use to work as engraver for publishers companys. I work with finale2004 under MacOSX, im really impressed by this new software, but ive got a few questions: - How much quick can be this program? I use to work with really big scores for large orchestra.

switch to lilypond from finale

2005-12-07 Thread Josué
Hi list, i use to work as engraver for publishers companys. I work with finale2004 under MacOSX, im really impressed by this new software, but ive got a few questions: - How much quick can be this program? I use to work with really big scores for large orchestra. - What about avant garde notati