Hi Federico,
2012/2/3 Federico Bruni :
> Il 02/02/2012 22:22, Thomas Morley ha scritto:
>
>> 1. Am I right you resigned of every highlighting within scheme?
>
>
> Yes, almost.
> I know nothing about Scheme. The only highlighting within Scheme that I'd
> like to preserve are the strings "". I've ju
Il 02/02/2012 22:22, Thomas Morley ha scritto:
1. Am I right you resigned of every highlighting within scheme?
Yes, almost.
I know nothing about Scheme. The only highlighting within Scheme that
I'd like to preserve are the strings "". I've just edited the scheme
definition and it works.
Is
Hi Federico,
2012/2/2 Federico Bruni :
> Il 02/01/2012 15:58, Thomas Morley ha scritto:
>>
>> I tested a file with a large scheme-definition.
>>
>> In the attached file you may notice some inconsequences:
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I have fixed the error in the scheme definition, so your file is highlig
Il 02/01/2012 15:58, Thomas Morley ha scritto:
I tested a file with a large scheme-definition.
In the attached file you may notice some inconsequences:
Hi Thomas,
I have fixed the error in the scheme definition, so your file is
highlighted correctly now.
I've done also some other improvement
Hi Harm,
thanks for your feedback.
Your example let me notice that I forgot that R (upper case) is a note
as well, so I've updated the note_duration regexp.
Il 02/01/2012 15:58, Thomas Morley ha scritto:
I tested a file with a large scheme-definition.
In the attached file you may notice some
Hi LilyPonders,
I'm following Graham's suggestion[0] and I'm asking here if you could
please test the attached lilypond language file for source-highlight.
There's an issue on the tracker[1] about syntax highlighting in the doc.
The first step to make it happen is writing a language file for a
