: Friday, July 30, 2010 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: tempo commands not in learning manual
Hello,
On 29/07/2010 23:31, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Dan Wilckens wrote Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:47 PM
My suggestion is to include the \tempo Allegro 4=160 type command in
the Rhythms section of the Learning Manual
Message-
From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk]
Sent: Thu 29/07/2010 23:31
To: James Lowe; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Cc: Lily-Devel List
Subject: Re: tempo commands not in learning manual
Dan Wilckens wrote Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:47 PM
Hi James,
I mainly thought the tempo command
Hello,
On 29/07/2010 23:31, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Dan Wilckens wrote Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:47 PM
My suggestion is to include the \tempo Allegro 4=160 type command in
the Rhythms section of the Learning Manual, since tempo is fundamental
to rhythm, and I didn't find it anywhere else in
Hi James,
I mainly thought the tempo command was too hard to find in the
documentation--too illogically placed for me to track down easily
navigating the notation reference headings (just tried it in the 2.13
doc's, had similar problems before with 2.12 doc's) and I actually
couldn't find the
Dan Wilckens wrote Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:47 PM
Hi James,
I mainly thought the tempo command was too hard to find in the
documentation--too illogically placed for me to track down easily
navigating the notation reference headings (just tried it in the
2.13 doc's, had similar problems
Dan,
On 25/07/2010 02:59, Dan Wilckens wrote:
Something so fundamental as tempo should be clearly explained
somewhere easy to
find in the documentation, and it seems to be difficult to find at
all in the
learning manual (looking at 2.12 documentation and briefly at 2.13).
In my view
this
Something so fundamental as tempo should be clearly explained somewhere easy to
find in the documentation, and it seems to be difficult to find at all in the
learning manual (looking at 2.12 documentation and briefly at 2.13). In my view
this is something fundamental enough to be in most pieces
