[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> great, but i hope there won't be the same degree of syntax updating
> going to the next version as there was from 1.8.0 to 1.9.8! i don't
I hope there would, since we only make changes if it improves anything
:-)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is there any plan to support tremolos shorter than a quarter?
i.e. \repeat "tremolo" 2 { c32 e32 }
i've had occasion to need them, but they generate a warning and end up
looking like squished-together quarter tremolos with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> is there any plan to support tremolos shorter than a quarter?
>
> i.e. \repeat "tremolo" 2 { c32 e32 }
>
> i've had occasion to need them, but they generate a warning and end up
> looking like squished-together quarter tremolos
is there any plan to support tremolos shorter than a quarter?
i.e. \repeat "tremolo" 2 { c32 e32 }
i've had occasion to need them, but they generate a warning and end up
looking like squished-together quarter tremolos with no beam between the
stems. i'll have to hack a
