On 10/20/08 4:33 PM, "Joseph Wakeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No nastiness felt from this end, your response was not entirely
> unexpected -- after all, as you say, you've put in a lot of effort to
> generate this tool as it is. I'm very grateful for that, and a friendly
> prod to put m
Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2008/10/20 Joseph Wakeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Very nice! A couple of comments: first (I guess you know this) the
>> bracketed (3+3+2) etc. markup should surely not affect the horizontal
>> music spacing as it does. Is there anything that can be done?
>
> \with-dimen
Graham Percival wrote:
> It's not markup. I've changed the way the time signature is
> displayed. The parenthesis is part of the time signature.
Sorry, that was my bad phrasing (again). I understood perfectly well
what it was -- if it wasn't part of the time signature, the spacing
wouldn't have
2008/10/20 Joseph Wakeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Very nice! A couple of comments: first (I guess you know this) the
> bracketed (3+3+2) etc. markup should surely not affect the horizontal
> music spacing as it does. Is there anything that can be done?
\with-dimensions #''(0 . 0) #'(0 . 0) for
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:04:50PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > Mao, I added the comments just before sending the file, and forgot
> > that scheme used a different symbol for comments.
> >
> > The attached file fixes this.
>
> Very nice! A couple of comments: first
Graham Percival wrote:
> Mao, I added the comments just before sending the file, and forgot
> that scheme used a different symbol for comments.
>
> The attached file fixes this.
Very nice! A couple of comments: first (I guess you know this) the
bracketed (3+3+2) etc. markup should surely not aff
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:18:17PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > I am pleased to re-announce that I am an idiot. Please ignore the
> > previous message about "elegant" compound time signatures; the
> > attached file is *much* better.
>
> I'm afraid I get horrible horr
If you delete the % comments from the scheme bit it runs without errors.
The markups are nice but they make the notes slide over to the right.
Jon
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 15:00, Graham Percival wrote:
I am pleased to re-announce that I am an idiot.
Ahem...
Please ignore
On 20 Oct 2008, at 15:00, Graham Percival wrote:
I am pleased to re-announce that I am an idiot.
Ahem...
Please ignore the
previous message about "elegant" compound time signatures; the
attached file is *much* better.
- arbitrary time signatures, with arbitrary compound-ness.
- more aesthe
Graham Percival wrote:
> I am pleased to re-announce that I am an idiot. Please ignore the
> previous message about "elegant" compound time signatures; the
> attached file is *much* better.
I'm afraid I get horrible horrible errors with the files you attached
:-( The resulting output has no time
Dear all,
I am pleased to re-announce that I am an idiot. Please ignore the
previous message about "elegant" compound time signatures; the
attached file is *much* better.
- arbitrary time signatures, with arbitrary compound-ness.
- more aesthetically pleasing graphical display, including less
11 matches
Mail list logo
