PDF Creator is correctly interpreting the .ps output of lilypond, but
Scribus can't import it whithout mistakes...
I think the problem doesn't come from Lilypond, but from Scribus's
interpretation of Postscripts...
François
___
lilypond-user mailing
You're right, I can import pdfs. But it's more difficult to optimize the
size of the picture: you have to specify in lilypond the exact size of the
musicsheet in order to avoid blank spaces.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
I would like to import musicsheets in Scribus. The only way I found is
export a .png file with Lilypond, and import it in Scribus. But I think that
a .ps importation would be a better solution: less space and better quality.
I put in attachment an exemple of a .ps output (converted in .png by
I tried to use the .ps output, but it's not so good as the .pdf one. It's the
same thing under Windows XP or Ubuntu 7.10.
Do you have any solutions ?
François
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
François Labadens wrote:
I tried to use the .ps output, but it's not so good as the .pdf one. It's the
same thing under Windows XP or Ubuntu 7.10.
Do you have any solutions ?
It does look pretty grainy by itself, but it's used to produce a great
looking pdf, so it shouldn't be a major worry.
It's been my understanding that most viewers and applications will
render a .ps file by way of a low resolution bitmap 'preview', so as not
to clog RAM while you're working on files. When you go to print or
export the file, the .ps file is rendered at whatever resolution you
specify in your
If you clarify what you mean by ugly, it's easier to comment on your
problems.
Do you mean fussy-looking or do you mean that certain symbols are
missing or replaced
by something else? Also, what kind of applications do you use when
viewing/printing the PS file.
The Postscript output by
