,
> > Ken
> >
> > On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Phil Holmes wrote:
> > > AFAICS there is no requirement to use gregorian.ly to get a caesura.
> > > Why do you think there is?
> > >
> > > See
> > > https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/expressiv
gt; > On 01/05/2022 06:38, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> > > Hi;
> > >
> > > I see that the use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly",
> > > according to the Notation Reference.
> > >
> > > But doing this completely screws up
to use gregorian.ly to get a caesura.
> Why do you think there is?
>
> See
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-curves#breath-marks
>
>
> On 01/05/2022 06:38, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I see that the us
help.
Thanks,
Ken
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 6:47 AM Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> > I see that the use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly",
> > according to the Notation Reference.
> >
> > But doing this completely screws up all the
Hi Ken,
I see that the use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly",
according to the Notation Reference.
But doing this completely screws up all the default display Lilypond
code that I've been using all along.
I'm trying to engrave "Somewhere Over the Rainbow", w
\include "gregorian.ly",
according to the Notation Reference.
But doing this completely screws up all the default display Lilypond
code that I've been using all along.
I'm trying to engrave "Somewhere Over the Rainbow", which definitely
does not belong in the Gregorian time p
Hi;
I see that the use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly",
according to the Notation Reference.
But doing this completely screws up all the default display Lilypond
code that I've been using all along.
I'm trying to engrave "Somewhere Over the Rainbow", w
