Re: wind instrument transposition (was Good work, Keith!)

2011-10-05 Thread Neil Thornock
> I've been a pianist for 45 years and a clarinetist for 40, so I am > comfortably aware of transposition issues, but what you're saying > doesn't explain the issues I pointed out.  If a piece is in concert D > and I am asked to play it on my Bb clarinet, my music should have a key > signature of E

Re: wind instrument transposition (was Good work, Keith!)

2011-10-04 Thread David Rogers
Tim Roberts writes: I hope you will permit me to flog this dead horse a bit more. Tim Reeves wrote: But different horns were chosen not because of the difference in tone quality (so much), but simply to fit into the key of the piece, "back in the day". There's no reason to write horn in

Re: wind instrument transposition (was Good work, Keith!)

2011-10-04 Thread Tim Roberts
I hope you will permit me to flog this dead horse a bit more. Tim Reeves wrote: > But different horns were chosen not because of the difference in tone > quality (so much), but simply to fit into the key of the piece, "back in > the day". There's no reason to write horn in D except that the piec

Re: wind instrument transposition (was Good work, Keith!)

2011-10-04 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Tim Roberts wrote: > Tim Reeves wrote: >> >> Nothing odd about it at all. > > I disagree, but we'll get to that in a moment. > >> It would be odd if a horn part in C or E, etc. had any key signature at all. > > Why? Every other instrument has a key signature appro

Re: wind instrument transposition (was Good work, Keith!)

2011-10-04 Thread Tim Roberts
Tim Reeves wrote: > > Nothing odd about it at all. I disagree, but we'll get to that in a moment. > It would be odd if a horn part in C or E, etc. had any key signature at all. Why? Every other instrument has a key signature appropriate to the transposition in use at the current time. Why shou

Re: wind instrument transposition (was Good work, Keith!)

2011-10-04 Thread Tim Reeves
> Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:57:58 -0700 > From: Tim Roberts > To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org" > Subject: Re: Good work, Keith! > Message-ID: <4e8b3b16.6060...@probo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Francisco Vila wrote: > > Hello all, I think this is remarkable: Keith