wrong beaming

2012-03-15 Thread luis jure
hello list, i have a problem with beaming when combining a sixteenth notes triplet with straight 16ths. without any kind of tweaks, the following code produces the output in the attached image: \relative c' { \time 2/4 c16 c \times 2/3 { c8 c16 } \times 2/3 { c8 c16 } c16 c } as you see,

Re: wrong beaming

2012-03-15 Thread James
Hello, On 15 March 2012 02:45, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote: hello list, i have a problem with beaming when combining a sixteenth notes triplet with straight 16ths. without any kind of tweaks, the following code produces the output in the attached image: \relative c' { \time

Re: wrong beaming

2012-03-15 Thread luis jure
on 2012-03-15 at 15:26 James wrote: This actually worked in 2.12.3 So I have opened http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2408 great, thank you. i see, however, that 2.12.3 was not quite correct in the second case: the beamlet belonging to the triplet sixteenth should be pointing

RE: wrong beaming

2012-03-15 Thread Steven Weber
: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:46 PM To: lilypond-user Subject: wrong beaming hello list, i have a problem with beaming when combining a sixteenth notes triplet with straight 16ths. without any kind of tweaks, the following code produces the output in the attached image: \relative c' { \time 2/4 c16 c

Re: wrong beaming

2012-03-15 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 3/14/12 8:45 PM, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote: hello list, i have a problem with beaming when combining a sixteenth notes triplet with straight 16ths. without any kind of tweaks, the following code produces the output in the attached image: \relative c' { \time 2/4 c16 c \times

Re: wrong beaming

2012-03-15 Thread Mark Knoop
At 13:01 on 15 Mar 2012, luis jure wrote: on 2012-03-15 at 15:26 James wrote: Use manual beaming? yes, manual beaming solved the first quarter note: \relative c' { \time 2/4 c16[ c \times 2/3 { c8 c16] } \times 2/3 { c8 c16 } c16 c } but i still don't know how to correct the second quarter

Re: wrong beaming

2012-03-15 Thread luis jure
on 2012-03-15 at 16:23 Carl Sorensen wrote: What issues do you believe it is related to? i thought that it might be related to issues like 11 and 2113, for example: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=11 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2113 (not the same,

Re: wrong beaming

2012-03-15 Thread luis jure
on 2012-03-15 at 16:22 Mark Knoop wrote: \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8) \set subdivideBeams = ##t yes! thank you very much. (when the triplet is in the second half of the quarter note, i still have to hard-code a manual beam, though. works great when the triplet is in the first half).