On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 04:56:39 +0100
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Donald asked: [... would very much appreciate ]
> > help on how to skew noteheads from the vertical axis in
> > pianomusic with complicated inner voicings.
>
> In chords, ie. between < > noteheads should be put on
> opp
donald_j_axel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I placed a copy of lilypond-profile in
> /etc/profile.d/lilypond-profile but as I run lilypond in a
> chroot'ed gentoo-partition it was not sourced. When sourcing it
> manually the xdvi can run a lot of font-things, but the picture
> is not much better,
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:02:09 +0100
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> donald_j_axel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > xdvi seems broken here. There are no noteheads
>
> Did you source lilypond-profile during your shell startup?
No. I placed a copy of lilypond-profile in
/etc/profile.d/l
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Atte André Jensen wrote:
> I know that it's possible to kick gv to redisplay the file using
>
> killall -HUP gv
>
> but this seems to simply close xdvi. Anyone knows about a similar way to
> force xdvi to reread??
Click on the "State" menu button on the gv win
Atte André Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know that it's possible to kick gv to redisplay the file using
>
> killall -HUP gv
>
> but this seems to simply close xdvi. Anyone knows about a similar way
> to force xdvi to reread??
Try to send an R to xdvi by xvkbd.
Feri.
__
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
AFAIK xdvi doesn't watch the file in the sense gv does.
Xdvi checks for changes only when you click on it and when
its window is shown.
Ah, yeah, that works...
I know that it's possible to kick gv to redisplay the file using
killall -HUP gv
but this seems to simply close xd
donald_j_axel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> xdvi seems broken here. There are no noteheads
Did you source lilypond-profile during your shell startup?
> TeX->dvi->postscript->pdf gives a useable printout.
Yes, but it doesn't give you point&click. Try it!
Feri.
___
>> gv watch works like a charm here...
>
> Good. Isn't it giving a better rendering? Did it fill your needs?
I think you misunderstood me. Although gv in some ways looks better (and
zooms properly) xdvi is much nicer when editing thanks to point-and-click.
>> xdvi doesn't blink. If I press "rere
Atte André Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it used to be so that xdvi "watched" the dvi file
> (automatically refreashed when a new file was produced),
> but now it doesn't anymore. How do I get get that feature
> back??
AFAIK xdvi doesn't watch the file in the sense gv does.
Xdvi ch
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:16:34 +0100
Atte André Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> donald_j_axel wrote:
>
> > I have experienced the same with gv some weeks ago.
Atte:
> gv watch works like a charm here...
Donald now:
Good. Isn't it giving a better rendering? Did it fill your needs?
> > The
>
donald_j_axel wrote:
Hey Atte, I have experienced the same with gv some weeks ago.
gv watch works like a charm here...
The
note-layout blinked, but nothing changed!
xdvi doesn't blink. If I press "reread" the file is indeed reread.
Maybe I should have noted that I run debian/unstable...
--
peac
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:28:20 +0100
Atte André Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since lilypond.org has been unreashable (at least) since yesterday I
> seek help here:
>
> I think it used to be so that xdvi "watched" the dvi file (automatically
> refreashed when a new file was produced), but n
Since lilypond.org has been unreashable (at least) since yesterday I
seek help here:
I think it used to be so that xdvi "watched" the dvi file (automatically
refreashed when a new file was produced), but now it doesn't anymore.
How do I get get that feature back??
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
13 matches
Mail list logo
