Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives?

My very first contribution :-) Nice! Colin Campbell, May 04, 2024 at 02:51: > Thanks again for the text, Ken!  I've put it up for review along with a > bunch of housekeeping bits, and it could get merged into the > documentation mid-week.  You'll be able to point to your contribution to >

Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives?

Thanks again for the text, Ken!  I've put it up for review along with a bunch of housekeeping bits, and it could get merged into the documentation mid-week.  You'll be able to point to your contribution to LilyPond! Cheers, Colin On 2024-05-01 22:33, Kenneth Flak wrote: OK, giving it a

Printing music with CSS Grid: any relevance to LilyPond?

On another forum, I came across a web-development demo that uses CSS Grid to display responsive-layout music notation. " *Printing music with CSS Grid* Too often have I witnessed the improvising musician sweaty-handedly attempting to

Re: The demise of ly:multi-measure-rest::percent

On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 18:01 +0200, Hans Aikema wrote: > > > > On 3 May 2024, at 15:34, Richard Shann > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 09:25 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > > > is there a reason you don't use \repeat percent in the first > > > > > place ? >

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 3:04 AM Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > If you want the (de-)crescendo to stop at the barline, then you > shouldn't need such solutions, since \< and \> have the to-barline > property set by default, which means that even if the \! is placed after > the bar line, the hairpin

Re: The demise of ly:multi-measure-rest::percent

> On 3 May 2024, at 15:34, Richard Shann wrote: > > On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 09:25 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> is there a reason you don't use \repeat percent in the first place ? >>> It's easier for users of Denemo to have a single piece of LilyPond >>> syntax at

Re: The demise of ly:multi-measure-rest::percent

On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 09:25 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Richard, > > > > is there a reason you don't use \repeat percent in the first > > > place ? > > It's easier for users of Denemo to have a single piece of LilyPond > > syntax at the place they want to see the "%" > > How is this > >

Re: The demise of ly:multi-measure-rest::percent

Hi Richard, >> is there a reason you don't use \repeat percent in the first place ? > It's easier for users of Denemo to have a single piece of LilyPond > syntax at the place they want to see the "%" How is this \repeat percent 2 { c c c c } not “a single piece of Lilypond syntax at the

Re: Transparent box around notes

Hi Paolo, hi David, I've replaced the current stencil function with the one from the openLilyLib "frames" module (which has even more capabilities). Here is the result: https://github.com/KlausBlum/Ly-Boxer-Snippet If you like, please feel free to experiment or add further things... I'll try to

Re: The demise of ly:multi-measure-rest::percent

On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 13:04 +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote: > On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 12:43, Richard Shann > wrote: > > > > In earlier versions of LilyPond I avoided the use of \repeat > > percent 2 > > {} syntax by overwriting the stencil for a whole bar rest: > > > > \version "2.20.0" > > { c c c

Re: The demise of ly:multi-measure-rest::percent

On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 12:43, Richard Shann wrote: > > In earlier versions of LilyPond I avoided the use of \repeat percent 2 > {} syntax by overwriting the stencil for a whole bar rest: > > \version "2.20.0" > { c c c c > \once \override MultiMeasureRest.stencil = #ly:multi-measure-rest::percent

The demise of ly:multi-measure-rest::percent

In earlier versions of LilyPond I avoided the use of \repeat percent 2 {} syntax by overwriting the stencil for a whole bar rest: \version "2.20.0" { c c c c \once \override MultiMeasureRest.stencil = #ly:multi-measure-rest::percent \once \override MultiMeasureRest #'thickness = #0.48 R1*4/4 }

Re: \after … \beforeLast?

On 2024-05-02 21:19, Knute Snortum wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:31 AM Pierre-Luc Gauthier wrote: Le jeu. 2 mai 2024, à 13 h 08, Knute Snortum a écrit : > Perhaps I'm not getting the need for this command as you could using an empty chord at the end of the repeat to do