On 10 Aug 24, Loïc Minier wrote:
>
> So what kind of operations do we want to be able to do?
>
> * generate an u-boot kernel image from a zImage
>- input: zImage, kernel load address
>- output: uImage
> * generate an u-boot initrd image from an initrd.gz
>- input: initrd.gz, initrd
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>
> You're kind of playing games with the ABI files for the new mx51 flavour,
> but I uploaded anyways.
So if I bump the ABI then I don't need ABI-1 files for new flavour?
>
> --
> Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
>
___
Looks like buildd borkage.
Original Message
Subject: [Build #1931878] armel build of linux-linaro 2.6.35-1003.7 in
ubuntu maverick RELEASE
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:40:11 -
From: Launchpad Buildd System
Reply-To: Launchpad Buildd System
To: tim.gard...@canonical.com
*
On 08/23/2010 07:36 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> Tim,
>
> The following changes since commit 951315de2583af8b51bf73ea284fdb8999f4f51c:
>Tim Gardner (1):
> UBUNTU: Linaro-2.6.35-1002.6
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-linaro.git linaro
>
>
Tim,
The following changes since commit d55a1cc8f7b08304b9a6b098584e1f21314a318b:
Tim Gardner (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1002.7
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
John Rigby (2):
LINARO: Add mx51 flavour
LINAR
Tim,
The following changes since commit 951315de2583af8b51bf73ea284fdb8999f4f51c:
Tim Gardner (1):
UBUNTU: Linaro-2.6.35-1002.6
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-linaro.git linaro
John Rigby (5):
LINARO: [Config] Fix vexpress config
+++ Dechesne, Nicolas [2010-08-23 23:31 +0200]:
> Hello,
>
> I have another question related to cross compilation...
>
> I am still trying to setup a functional cross compilation environment for our
> packages. I want to be able to build without xdeb, using debuild command (this
> is mainly becau
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
> I am still trying to setup a functional cross compilation
> environment for our packages. I want to be able to build without
> xdeb, using debuild command (this is mainly because we use other
> tools such as git-buildpackage).
(You might be able to
Hey
There are a bunch of places where we generate uImages and which
duplicate information.
a kernel build most commonly outputs a zImage; this is then converted
to an uImage for u-boot consumption with some rune like:
mkimage -A arm -O linux -T kernel -C none \
-a 0x800080
Hello,
I have another question related to cross compilation...
I am still trying to setup a functional cross compilation environment
for our packages. I want to be able to build without xdeb, using debuild
command (this is mainly because we use other tools such as
git-buildpackage).
When I
Hi,
The Linaro Beta Freeze comes into effect Thursday 26th August 2010, i.e. this
Thusday! [1]. After the
deadline _all_ uploads to the main archive will have to be approved manually by
the release team. For
a further explanation of what the Beta Freeze entails and how to get your
changes i
There is now a "stable" 2.6.35-based Linaro kernel repository now
available from:
git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.35.git
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.35.git;a=summary
Unlike the linaro-next tree which will continue to evolve and be rebuilt
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:31:37 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Do we already have a linaro support status for packages implemented? or are
> you refering to the ubuntu style main/universe/package-set support status
> here?
I'm asking both conceptually and concretely.
In theory, how does the support
As discussed between Loïc, John and I, some kernel repositoryes have
been moved around on git.linaro.org to better reflect their usage, and
to give them more "official" sounding names.
Unless people really complain, I don't think this is worth adding
backward compatibility symlinks at this poin
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:29 PM, James Westby wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:06:18 +0200, Alexander Sack
> wrote:
> > > 6. What are the use cases for support information?
> > >
> > >
> > We want to label hwpacks as "unsupported" or "community" so we can offer
> > them to download on snapshots.l
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:06:18 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > 6. What are the use cases for support information?
> >
> >
> We want to label hwpacks as "unsupported" or "community" so we can offer
> them to download on snapshots.linaro.org while sending a clear message that
> those are not officia
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:52:47 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> I thought a bit more about this and i think the single hwpacks policy makes
> the "clean up" part mentioned in last sentence of user story 2 easier to
> implement.
Right.
Maybe we want hardware pack types in the future, so that you can
> > > * ACTION: ARM to discuss giving out internal Eclipse based tool
> > > (similar to powertop) (no ETA as of now)
The tool is an Eclipse-based generic event viewer. Internally, we're displaying
'power events,' such as those that Srinivas' recent ftrace patches around
cpufreq/cpuidle. Ther
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:21 PM, James Westby wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:14:18 +0200, Alexander Sack
> wrote:
> > Yeah. hwpacks should have a unique id in their meta info. In that way you
> > can figure this.
>
> No, what I mean is that we may want to have any hardware pack containing
> a ke
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:14:18 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Yeah. hwpacks should have a unique id in their meta info. In that way you
> can figure this.
No, what I mean is that we may want to have any hardware pack containing
a kernel to supercede any other containing a kernel. Or instead we migh
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:14 PM, James Westby wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:06:18 +0200, Alexander Sack
> wrote:
> > in theory yes, but practically I don't expect this to become a major use
> > case. If it's easier assuming that there is just one in the first phase,
> > lets do that.
>
> The bi
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:06:18 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> in theory yes, but practically I don't expect this to become a major use
> case. If it's easier assuming that there is just one in the first phase,
> lets do that.
The big problem I see is knowing which hwpacks should supercede all
other
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:26 PM, James Westby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Scott asked me to take a look at the hwpack spec:
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/Specs/10.11/HardwarePacks
>
> I took the liberty of editing it somewhat to make the definition of a
> hardware pack clearer, and
23 matches
Mail list logo
