[PATCH] cpufreq for freescale mx51

2010-10-05 Thread yong . shen
From: Yong Shen yong.s...@linaro.org it is tested on babbage 3.0 Signed-off-by: Yong Shen yong.s...@linaro.org --- arch/arm/Kconfig |6 + arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig |1 + arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile |2 +-

Maverick packages patched to build with xdeb

2010-10-05 Thread Peter Pearse
Are available from https://launchpad.net/~peter-pearse/+archive/cross-source deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/peter-pearse/cross-source/ubuntu maverick main deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/peter-pearse/cross-source/ubuntu maverick main [Any binaries produced will be amd64/i686 proving the host

Re: Maverick packages patched to build with xdeb

2010-10-05 Thread Alexander Sack
Hi Peter, On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Peter Pearse peter.pea...@linaro.org wrote: [Any binaries produced will be amd64/i686 proving the host build is unbroken] Only tested to build with gcc-4.5-arm-linux-gnueabi xdeb -a armel --apt-source Resulting armel binaries not tested Is there

Re: Maverick packages patched to build with xdeb

2010-10-05 Thread Peter Pearse
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote: Hi Peter, On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Peter Pearse peter.pea...@linaro.org wrote: [Any binaries produced will be amd64/i686 proving the host build is unbroken] Only tested to build with gcc-4.5-arm-linux-gnueabi

the linaro toolchain and older arm versions

2010-10-05 Thread John Rigby
I believe that the libgcc.a in our toolchain contains Thumb-2 code. I verified this by doing objdump on libgcc.a and I see combinations of 16 and 32 bit instructions. So does that mean that the toolchain is only usable for ARM versions that support Thumb-2? Thanks, John

Re: the linaro toolchain and older arm versions

2010-10-05 Thread Michael Hope
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:23 AM, John Rigby john.ri...@linaro.org wrote: Thanks Michael.  Just wanted to make sure I understood.  The do no harm goal and the Thumb2 libgcc seem to be somewhat contradictory however.  I realize that choices need to be made and only odd ducks like me will likely

Re: the linaro toolchain and older arm versions

2010-10-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 04:23:01PM -0600, John Rigby wrote: Thanks Michael. Just wanted to make sure I understood. The do no harm goal and the Thumb2 libgcc seem to be somewhat contradictory however. I realize that choices need to be made and only odd ducks like me will likely run into

Re: [Patch] Add imx51 support into linaro-media-create

2010-10-05 Thread Shawn Guo
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Loïc Minier loic.min...@linaro.org wrote: +      cat ${TMP_DIR}/boot.cmd BOOTCMD +setenv bootcmd 'fatload mmc 0:1 0x9000 uImage; fatload mmc 0:1 0x9080 uInitrd; bootm 0x9000 0x9080'  no mmc init? This is something I'm not very clear.  

linaro-media-create speedup

2010-10-05 Thread Tom Gall
Greets, As a side project I've created a fairly simple performance improvement for the linaro-media-create tool. Basically the copying of the root_fs happens earlier in the process such that hwpack and a number of other steps are done in parallel and then at the end there's one last rsync to make