On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Now, to answer your real question. :) Linaro uses bzr in large part because
> Linaro uses Launchpad, and Launchpad integrates with bzr (and it does not
> integrate with git). Some of us on the Linaro team also have a personal
> preference for bzr, so
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Hi Xianghua,
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:24:16AM -0500, Xianghua Xiao wrote:
>> I'm new here and have a dumb question:
>> why is linaro using bzr while nearly the whole linux-related projects
>> are either using or switching to git?
>
>
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, John Rigby wrote:
> Updated pull req based on a private working tree:
>
> The following changes since commit fd2fd961aa221866038549dd85a0f744e6bc8c5e:
>
> Make PTRACE_SINGLESTEP work with user helpers (2010-10-19 07:54:34 -0400)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, John Rigby wrote:
> Nicolas,
>
> I cobbled together a fix for the corrupted console text bug #627779
> from last weeks email thread about the ioremap issue on ARM. It
> reverts the existing fix for bug #624115 and replaces it with RMK's
> proposal and an omap fb patch from F
Hi Xianghua,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:24:16AM -0500, Xianghua Xiao wrote:
> I'm new here and have a dumb question:
> why is linaro using bzr while nearly the whole linux-related projects
> are either using or switching to git?
This is a frequently repeated idea, but I think it's an exaggeration
Hi Shawn,
Le 19/10/2010 18:28, Shawn Guo a écrit :
If I understand correctly, you meant the tree below.
git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git
Can you please tell which branch has both your bits and Wolfram's? I
can find your bits on branch imx-for-2.6.37, but Wolfram's are not
there.
Updated pull req based on a private working tree:
The following changes since commit fd2fd961aa221866038549dd85a0f744e6bc8c5e:
Make PTRACE_SINGLESTEP work with user helpers (2010-10-19 07:54:34 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/jcrigby/linux.git maste
Hi Eric,
If I understand correctly, you meant the tree below.
git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git
Can you please tell which branch has both your bits and Wolfram's? I
can find your bits on branch imx-for-2.6.37, but Wolfram's are not
there.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Eric Bé
I'm new here and have a dumb question:
why is linaro using bzr while nearly the whole linux-related projects
are either using or switching to git?
Thanks,
Xianghua
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/l
Nicolas,
I cobbled together a fix for the corrupted console text bug #627779
from last weeks email thread about the ioremap issue on ARM. It
reverts the existing fix for bug #624115 and replaces it with RMK's
proposal and an omap fb patch from Felipe Contreras. I have tested it
on Beagle and the
Hmm, not offhand. I'm just dashing out to a meeting for the rest of
the day. I'll have a look later. Is any of this stuff available/in maverick yet
so I can try to reproduce?
not in maverick, but everything is in a public PPA (ppa:tiomap-dev/release) so
you should be able to use this to rep
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libtitiler-memmgr-dev (>=
> 0.24.9)
> which I can't explain.
> Any idea what can be wrong?
Currently, xdeb expects to install a package's native build-deps *and*
the crossed build-deps (or a subset o
+++ Dechesne, Nicolas [2010-10-19 14:34 +0200]:
> hello,
>
> i am back to this old thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org/msg00084.html (which
> i cannot find in my inbox anymore).
> From the log, it titiler-memmgr builds fine, and it creates the following
> packages:
Hi,
Le 19/10/2010 09:20, Amit Kucheria a écrit :
Thanks for the patches. Could you please send patch 1& 2 to LAKML too for
review?
you will have to rebase on Sascha's tree as your first patch includes things
which are already there.
Eric
___
lina
hello,
i am back to this old thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org/msg00084.html (which i
cannot find in my inbox anymore).
so finally all our TI packages have made it to a public PPA:
ppa:tiomap-dev/release.
I am trying to build our stuff with xdeb, using a maveric
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, John Rigby wrote:
> Nicolas,
>
> Thanks for the info. I'll wait to see more patches/testing from Shawn
> before pulling.
You should be OK to pull now.
Nicolas
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I just sent out the patch (to linaro-dev) which is working on Linaro
> kernel tree per my test.
Thanks. I merged them and pushed out the result.
Nicolas
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 05:28:51PM +0800, Yong Shen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > +#include
> > > +
> > > +static struct cpu_op mx51_cpu_op[] = {
> > > + {
> > > + .cpu_rate = 16000,},
> > > + {
> > > + .cpu_rate = 8,},
> > > +};
> >
> > Why did you remove the values between
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:47:19PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> I've tried using this tree, (as well as the pengutronix.de tree and
> linus' upstream) with an older 9.04 disk image, but none of the booting
> kernels could find the sd card (no mmcblk devices located in the boot
> log)
I didn't foll
Hi,
Le 19/10/2010 03:47, john stultz a écrit :
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 18:58 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
Here you go. I'm using Linaro tree below.
git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.35.git
I've tried using this tree, (as well as the pengutronix.de tree and
linus' upstream) with an older
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I like the merge request way, but I'm behind a firewall. I was told
> that it's tough to get bzr push through firewall. Any suggestion to
> break the firewall through?
You don't have outbound SSH access? That's problematic indeed; is this
something you c
Hi Loic,
I like the merge request way, but I'm behind a firewall. I was told
that it's tough to get bzr push through firewall. Any suggestion to
break the firewall through?
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010, Shawn Guo wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/656962
I merged this; would be awesome if you could send further code changes
as bzr merge request (push your topic branch to launchpad and bzr
lp-propose-merge)!
Thanks
--
Loïc Minier
__
Vishwanath,
Thanks for suggestion.
Voltage change is not a must for frequency change, and it can be integrate
in after regulator driver is ready for mx51.
Yong
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Vishwanath Sripathy <
vishwanath.sripa...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Yong,
>
> >On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:51
>
>
>
> > +#include
> > +
> > +static struct cpu_op mx51_cpu_op[] = {
> > + {
> > + .cpu_rate = 16000,},
> > + {
> > + .cpu_rate = 8,},
> > +};
>
> Why did you remove the values between 800MHz and 160MHz? 400MHz and
> 200Mhz should work also, no?
>
> It proved that thos
Yong,
>On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:51 PM, wrote:
>From: Yong Shen
>the operating points are tested on babbage 3.0
Commit log needs more description like
What are the supported operating points,
Is there any link between mpu OPP and other devices?
What are the platforms this patch is tested agains
>
>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +struct cpu_wp *(*get_cpu_wp)(int *wp);
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > This is not needed.
> > > > >
> > > > This is needed, otherwise it does not pass compile.
> > >
> > > This hunk is the only change to arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c and get_cpu_wp
> > > is introduced with
Hi John,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM, john stultz wrote:
> So sort of to echo what Nicolas said, it seems pretty difficult to
> follow which set of patches (as well as what .config settings) are
> needed to get upstream booting.
>
I just sent out the patch (to linaro-dev) which is working on
Hi amit,
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Yong,
>
> I get the following errors if I try to compile this with the Linaro
> toolchain.
>
> In file included from
>
> /home/amit/work/sources/linux-amit-upstream.git/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/hardware.h:63:0,
>
Shawn,
Thanks for the patches. Could you please send patch 1 & 2 to LAKML too for
review?
/Amit
On 10 Oct 19, Shawn Guo wrote:
> After Nicolas merged Wolfram Sang's imx51 mmc driver, the patches
> are to add missing bits for getting a bootable Linaro mx51evk
> kernel.
>
> It's not clear to me i
30 matches
Mail list logo
