After Nicolas merged Wolfram Sang's imx51 mmc driver, the patches
are to add missing bits for getting a bootable Linaro mx51evk
kernel.
It's not clear to me if the missing kernel configurations should
be addressed in Linaro kernel tree or packaging. I patched
mx51_defconfig anyway to show what
This patch are based on Eric Bénard's patches below, and only
picks up i.mx51 babbage specific bits.
- cpuimx51: update board support
- clock-mx51: factorize clk_set_parent and clk_get_rate
- imx-esdhc: update devices registration
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@gmail.com
---
Hi amit,
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.orgwrote:
Yong,
I get the following errors if I try to compile this with the Linaro
toolchain.
In file included from
Hi John,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM, john stultz johns...@us.ibm.com wrote:
So sort of to echo what Nicolas said, it seems pretty difficult to
follow which set of patches (as well as what .config settings) are
needed to get upstream booting.
I just sent out the patch (to linaro-dev)
+struct cpu_wp *(*get_cpu_wp)(int *wp);
+
This is not needed.
This is needed, otherwise it does not pass compile.
This hunk is the only change to arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c and get_cpu_wp
is introduced with this patch, so how can this break compilation?
Hi Loic,
I like the merge request way, but I'm behind a firewall. I was told
that it's tough to get bzr push through firewall. Any suggestion to
break the firewall through?
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Loïc Minier loic.min...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010, Shawn Guo wrote:
I like the merge request way, but I'm behind a firewall. I was told
that it's tough to get bzr push through firewall. Any suggestion to
break the firewall through?
You don't have outbound SSH access? That's problematic indeed; is this
something you
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 05:28:51PM +0800, Yong Shen wrote:
+#include linux/kernel.h
+
+static struct cpu_op mx51_cpu_op[] = {
+ {
+ .cpu_rate = 16000,},
+ {
+ .cpu_rate = 8,},
+};
Why did you remove the values between 800MHz and 160MHz?
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:47:19PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
I've tried using this tree, (as well as the pengutronix.de tree and
linus' upstream) with an older 9.04 disk image, but none of the booting
kernels could find the sd card (no mmcblk devices located in the boot
log)
I didn't follow
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, John Rigby wrote:
Nicolas,
Thanks for the info. I'll wait to see more patches/testing from Shawn
before pulling.
You should be OK to pull now.
Nicolas
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
hello,
i am back to this old thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org/msg00084.html (which i
cannot find in my inbox anymore).
so finally all our TI packages have made it to a public PPA:
ppa:tiomap-dev/release.
I am trying to build our stuff with xdeb, using a
Hi,
Le 19/10/2010 09:20, Amit Kucheria a écrit :
Thanks for the patches. Could you please send patch 1 2 to LAKML too for
review?
you will have to rebase on Sascha's tree as your first patch includes things
which are already there.
Eric
___
+++ Dechesne, Nicolas [2010-10-19 14:34 +0200]:
hello,
i am back to this old thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org/msg00084.html (which
i cannot find in my inbox anymore).
From the log, it titiler-memmgr builds fine, and it creates the following
packages:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libtitiler-memmgr-dev (=
0.24.9)
which I can't explain.
Any idea what can be wrong?
Currently, xdeb expects to install a package's native build-deps *and*
the crossed build-deps (or a subset of
Hmm, not offhand. I'm just dashing out to a meeting for the rest of
the day. I'll have a look later. Is any of this stuff available/in maverick yet
so I can try to reproduce?
not in maverick, but everything is in a public PPA (ppa:tiomap-dev/release) so
you should be able to use this to
I'm new here and have a dumb question:
why is linaro using bzr while nearly the whole linux-related projects
are either using or switching to git?
Thanks,
Xianghua
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Hi Eric,
If I understand correctly, you meant the tree below.
git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git
Can you please tell which branch has both your bits and Wolfram's? I
can find your bits on branch imx-for-2.6.37, but Wolfram's are not
there.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Eric
Updated pull req based on a private working tree:
The following changes since commit fd2fd961aa221866038549dd85a0f744e6bc8c5e:
Make PTRACE_SINGLESTEP work with user helpers (2010-10-19 07:54:34 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/jcrigby/linux.git
Hi Shawn,
Le 19/10/2010 18:28, Shawn Guo a écrit :
If I understand correctly, you meant the tree below.
git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git
Can you please tell which branch has both your bits and Wolfram's? I
can find your bits on branch imx-for-2.6.37, but Wolfram's are not
Hi Xianghua,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:24:16AM -0500, Xianghua Xiao wrote:
I'm new here and have a dumb question:
why is linaro using bzr while nearly the whole linux-related projects
are either using or switching to git?
This is a frequently repeated idea, but I think it's an exaggeration.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, John Rigby wrote:
Updated pull req based on a private working tree:
The following changes since commit fd2fd961aa221866038549dd85a0f744e6bc8c5e:
Make PTRACE_SINGLESTEP work with user helpers (2010-10-19 07:54:34 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Steve Langasek
steve.langa...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Xianghua,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:24:16AM -0500, Xianghua Xiao wrote:
I'm new here and have a dumb question:
why is linaro using bzr while nearly the whole linux-related projects
are either using or
22 matches
Mail list logo
