Re: ST-Ericsson ux500 BSP contents

2010-11-12 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Linus Walleij wrote: > I have now created a tree based on Torvalds' clean > v2.6.37-rc1 that is available straight off kernel.org: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson.git Excellent! > NOTE: I am no Jedi yet. I still have to learn a few

Re: linaro-next tree

2010-11-12 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:38 +, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > To sum it up, I am just asking you what are your plans for the linaro-next > > > tree and the operating mode we should aim

Re: ST-Ericsson ux500 BSP contents

2010-11-12 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 12 November 2010, Linus Walleij wrote: > 2010/9/29 Arnd Bergmann : > > > I think you need to stop basing on top of linux-next and > > move to basing on top of the smallest possible set of trees > > other than mainline. > > Sorry for learning and fixing delays... No problem. Welcome to

Re: ST-Ericsson ux500 BSP contents

2010-11-12 Thread Linus Walleij
2010/9/29 Arnd Bergmann : > I think you need to stop basing on top of linux-next and > move to basing on top of the smallest possible set of trees > other than mainline. Sorry for learning and fixing delays... I have now created a tree based on Torvalds' clean v2.6.37-rc1 that is available strai

Re: linaro-next tree

2010-11-12 Thread Catalin Marinas
Hi Nicolas, On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:38 +, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > To sum it up, I am just asking you what are your plans for the linaro-next > > tree and the operating mode we should aim for. > > I'm still wondering about that myself at the mo