On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:09:29 +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
> On 22 November 2010 15:02, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> >
> > If it's the XM (as your bootloader claims), then there is no on-board NAND.
> > Your SD card is the only storage, and you should be able to recover by
> > reformatting and updating the i
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Will Deacon wrote:
> Commit 1b6740a1 was marked as stable but conflicts with 93068241.
>
> This patch resolves the conflict so that an OProfile-enabled ARM
> kernel can be used.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas
> Cc: Linaro Dev
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
> ---
>
> Nicolas - thi
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:43:30AM -0200, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> I thought this old hwpack could be to blame, but I can't reproduce the
> error you saw with an image created using that hwpack. Anyway, there
> are newer hwpacks in
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-hwpacks/ which
Commit 1b6740a1 was marked as stable but conflicts with 93068241.
This patch resolves the conflict so that an OProfile-enabled ARM
kernel can be used.
Cc: Catalin Marinas
Cc: Linaro Dev
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
---
Nicolas - this patch fixes an unresolved merge conflict present in the
Linar
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> It would be u-boot. x-loader is up and configured, and looking for u-boot.
> x-load doesn't care which image it is though - you could load any
> other image and x-load will just jump to it and start executing.
oh right, sorry I thought Dave was asking
The general problem here is that the ondemand governor is aimed more at
power savings than performance. In cases where the ondemand governor
performs worse than the performance governor, the "sampling_down_factor"
tunable is often useful. I submitted the patch to add this tunable a
few weeks ago
Hi Ira, just out of curiosity, have you tried this with the 10.11 release
images? I know some people tested that with Beagle XM and it was reported
to work, so it may be worth seeing if it's something with your board, or
something in u-boot that has broken since then.
Thanks,
Paul Larson
On 22 November 2010 19:22, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Ira Rosen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After working fine for a while, the board crashed during the weekend,
> > and I am getting the following error:
> >
> > Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010, Dave Martin wrote:
> > u-boot.bin not found or blank nand contents - attempting serial boot . . .
> > ## Ready for binary (kermit) download to 0x80008000 at 115200 bps..
>
> Does anyone know what image is expected over serial in this situation?
> Is it MLO or u-boot.bin?
I
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Ira Rosen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After working fine for a while, the board crashed during the weekend,
> and I am getting the following error:
>
> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
> Beagle xM Rev A
> Reading boot sector
>
> not there
> u-boot
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 12:21 +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After working fine for a while, the board crashed during the weekend,
> and I am getting the following error:
>
> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
> Beagle xM Rev A
> Reading boot sector
>
> not there
> u-b
On 22 November 2010 15:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 November 2010 13:09, Ira Rosen wrote:
>> On 22 November 2010 15:02, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
>>> If it's the XM (as your bootloader claims), then there is no on-board NAND.
>>> Your SD card is the only storage, and you should be able to recover
Hi,
I was trying to investigate performance issues that we were seeing
with some usecases like Video playback on OMAP Platforms with ondemand
governor.
As part of this, I found a tool called cpufreq-bench
(http://lwn.net/Articles/339862) which can be used determine the
performance impact of ondema
On 22 November 2010 13:09, Ira Rosen wrote:
> On 22 November 2010 15:02, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
>> If it's the XM (as your bootloader claims), then there is no on-board NAND.
>> Your SD card is the only storage, and you should be able to recover by
>> reformatting and updating the images on the SD
On 22 November 2010 15:02, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
>
>
> On 22 November 2010 17:12, Ira Rosen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 22 November 2010 12:04, Pawel Moll wrote:
>> >> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
>> >> Beagle xM Rev A
>> >> Reading boot sector
>> >> not there
>> >>
On 22 November 2010 17:12, Ira Rosen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22 November 2010 12:04, Pawel Moll wrote:
> >> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
> >> Beagle xM Rev A
> >> Reading boot sector
> >> not there
> >> u-boot.bin not found or blank nand contents - attempting serial b
Hi,
On 22 November 2010 12:04, Pawel Moll wrote:
>> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
>> Beagle xM Rev A
>> Reading boot sector
>> not there
>> u-boot.bin not found or blank nand contents - attempting serial boot . . .
>> Any clue?
>
> Just a thought - looks like your N
amit.dan...@samsung.com wrote:
>
Maybe missed set name in your e-mail client.
> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap
>
> This patch adds support for clock information exposed to debug-fs
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c | 92
>
> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
> Beagle xM Rev A
> Reading boot sector
> not there
> u-boot.bin not found or blank nand contents - attempting serial boot . . .
> Any clue?
Just a thought - looks like your NAND got corrupted... Can you try to
boot your board holding
at TI, we have a corporate proxy, and we managed to use git properly by
using 'corkscrew' tool. Our user configuration is described here:
http://omappedia.org/wiki/Support_Tools#Firewalls
nicolas
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
> All,
>
> There are normally company network res
All,
There are normally company network restrictions such only port 80 or 443 is
allowed. And that's making it difficult for git to work. Do we have any proxy
or tunnel so that members behind the company firewall can work more
productively?
- eric
___
Hi Jeremy,
Your suggestion is better in the architecture view and it is clean and neat,
on the other side, mine is only concerning about the minimal changing
of previous code.
I will try your way and give your feedback.
Yong
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> >
22 matches
Mail list logo